Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jami vs WebRTC: What are the differences?
# Introduction
Key differences between Jami and WebRTC:
1. **Protocol and Architecture**: Jami uses a peer-to-peer architecture that allows direct communication between users without the need for a central server, making it more decentralized compared to WebRTC which relies on signaling and communication servers to establish connections.
2. **Security and Privacy**: Jami prioritizes user privacy by implementing end-to-end encryption for all communication. On the other hand, WebRTC only offers encryption as an option, leaving room for potential security vulnerabilities.
3. **Platform Compatibility**: Jami is available on a wide range of platforms including desktop, mobile, and web browsers, while WebRTC is primarily designed for use in web browsers, limiting its accessibility on other devices.
4. **Multi-Device Support**: Jami allows users to synchronize their conversations and contacts across multiple devices seamlessly, providing a consistent user experience. In contrast, WebRTC lacks built-in support for multi-device synchronization.
5. **Community and Development**: Jami is developed and maintained by a non-profit organization focused on user rights and privacy, fostering a strong community-driven approach. WebRTC, on the other hand, is supported by major tech companies, leading to a more corporate-backed development model.
6. **Customization and Extensibility**: Jami offers a more open and customizable framework, allowing developers to tailor the platform to their specific needs. WebRTC, while extensible, is more standardized and may have limitations in terms of customization.
In Summary, Jami and WebRTC differ in their protocol architecture, security measures, platform compatibility, multi-device support, development approach, and customization options.
Hello. So, I wanted to make a decision on whether to use WebRTC or Amazon Chime for a conference call (meeting). My plan is to build an app with features like video broadcasting, and the ability for all the participants to talk and chat. I have used Agora's web SDK for video broadcasting, and Socket.IO for chat features. As I read the comparison between Amazon Chime and WebRTC, it further intrigues me on what I should use given my scenario? Is there any way that so many related technologies could be a hindrance to the other? Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks. Ritwik Neema
I would recommend Amazon Chime. If I were you, I would eventually look into working with WebRTC as it is very interesting and teaches you a lot. I dove deep into webRTC recently building a webinar broadcasting application (one-to-many) and I can say it is difficult to understand how things actually work and to get it stable. I mean you can vaguely read up on it and get some things to work by copying code on StackOverflow or using a library but that wouldn't teach you much.
In short, go with Chime because it is easy to get started especially if you have a time constraint. But look into webRTC in the future as it enables you to build your own "Chime". Hope this helped!
Pros of Jami
- Decentralized1
- Multiplatform1
- Free1
- Available on windows, android, ios, iphones and linux1
Pros of WebRTC
- OpenSource3
- No Download2
- You can write anything around it, because it's a protoc1