Jasmine

960
1.1K
+ 1
178
SuperTest

369
28
+ 1
0
Add tool

Jasmine vs SuperTest: What are the differences?

Jasmine: DOM-less simple JavaScript testing framework. Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run; SuperTest: *A library for testing node.js HTTP servers *. It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.

Jasmine and SuperTest can be primarily classified as "Javascript Testing Framework" tools.

Jasmine and SuperTest are both open source tools. It seems that Jasmine with 14.5K GitHub stars and 2.13K forks on GitHub has more adoption than SuperTest with 8.8K GitHub stars and 568 GitHub forks.

Typeform, Coderus, and Zenefits are some of the popular companies that use Jasmine, whereas SuperTest is used by FASHION CLOUD, I Need to Talk, and Brainhub. Jasmine has a broader approval, being mentioned in 198 company stacks & 456 developers stacks; compared to SuperTest, which is listed in 6 company stacks and 7 developer stacks.

Decisions about Jasmine and SuperTest

We use Mocha for our FDA verification testing. It's integrated into Meteor, our upstream web application framework. We like how battle tested it is, its' syntax, its' options of reporters, and countless other features. Most everybody can agree on mocha, and that gets us half-way through our FDA verification and validation (V&V) testing strategy.

See more
Pros of Jasmine
Pros of SuperTest
    No pros available

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Jasmine
    Cons of SuperTest
      No cons available

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Jasmine?

      Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

      What is SuperTest?

      It is a super-agent driven library for testing node.js HTTP servers using a fluent API. It provides a high-level abstraction for testing HTTP, while still allowing you to drop down to the lower-level API provided by superagent.
      What companies use Jasmine?
      What companies use SuperTest?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Jasmine?
      What tools integrate with SuperTest?
        No integrations found
        What are some alternatives to Jasmine and SuperTest?
        Mocha
        Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
        Jest
        Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
        Karma
        Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
        Cypress
        Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
        Chai
        It is a BDD / TDD assertion library for node and the browser that can be delightfully paired with any javascript testing framework. It has several interfaces that allow the developer to choose the most comfortable. The chain-capable BDD styles provide an expressive language & readable style, while the TDD assert style provides a more classical feel.
        See all alternatives
        Interest over time