StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. jQuery Mobile vs jQuery UI

jQuery Mobile vs jQuery UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Stacks40.6K
Followers13.3K
Votes899
GitHub Stars11.3K
Forks5.3K
jQuery Mobile
jQuery Mobile
Stacks1.5K
Followers304
Votes0

jQuery Mobile vs jQuery UI: What are the differences?

  1. Mobile-focused vs General-purpose: jQuery Mobile is specifically designed for creating mobile web applications, while jQuery UI is more versatile and can be used for developing both desktop and mobile applications. jQuery Mobile provides a smoother user experience on mobile devices with its optimized touch-based navigation and responsive layout system.
  2. UI Components vs User Interface Effects: jQuery Mobile primarily focuses on UI components such as buttons, forms, navigation bars, and panels, which are tailored for mobile devices. On the other hand, jQuery UI offers a wide range of user interface effects like animations, drag-and-drop interactions, accordions, and dialogs, which are useful for enhancing visual appeal and user interaction in both desktop and mobile applications.
  3. Styling Approach: jQuery Mobile follows a ThemeRoller-based theming approach, where developers can easily customize and create their own mobile themes. jQuery UI, on the other hand, provides a variety of pre-built themes and styling options to customize the look and feel of UI components.
  4. Integration with External Frameworks: jQuery Mobile is designed to seamlessly integrate with popular mobile app development frameworks like PhoneGap, Cordova, and Sencha Touch, allowing developers to build native-like mobile applications. jQuery UI, on the other hand, focuses on providing UI components that can be integrated into existing web frameworks or applications.
  5. Dependency and File Size: jQuery Mobile has a larger footprint and heavier overall file size compared to jQuery UI, as it includes additional features specifically optimized for mobile devices. jQuery UI, being a more general-purpose library, has a smaller footprint and filesize.
  6. Browser Support: jQuery Mobile is primarily built for modern mobile browsers and may not provide full support for older browsers. jQuery UI, on the other hand, has better cross-browser compatibility and can work well on a wider range of desktop and mobile browsers.

In Summary, jQuery Mobile is a mobile-focused framework that offers optimized touch-based navigation, UI components, and mobile theming, while jQuery UI is a versatile framework that provides user interface effects, customizable themes, and better cross-browser compatibility for both desktop and mobile applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery UI
jQuery UI
jQuery Mobile
jQuery Mobile

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

jQuery Mobile is a HTML5-based user interface system designed to make responsive web sites and apps that are accessible on all smartphone, tablet and desktop devices.

-
Cross-platform; HTML5-based
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
40.6K
Stacks
1.5K
Followers
13.3K
Followers
304
Votes
899
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 215
    Ui components
  • 156
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
Cons
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase