Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Karma

2.4K
602
+ 1
181
TestingBot

10
39
+ 1
23
Add tool

Karma vs TestingBot: What are the differences?

What is Karma? Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript. Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

What is TestingBot? Automated and manual cross browser testing. TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Karma and TestingBot belong to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack.

Karma is an open source tool with 10.7K GitHub stars and 1.61K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Karma's open source repository on GitHub.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Karma
Pros of TestingBot
  • 61
    Test Runner
  • 35
    Open source
  • 27
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Great for running tests
  • 18
    Test on Real Devices
  • 11
    Backed by google
  • 5
    Easy Debugging
  • 2
    Remote Control
  • 5
    Good price
  • 3
    Real Devices
  • 2
    Selenium-compatible
  • 2
    Mobile support
  • 2
    Jenkins integration
  • 1
    Stable Tests
  • 1
    Great customer support
  • 1
    Cloud-based
  • 1
    IE support
  • 1
    Webdriver compatible
  • 1
    Bamboo Integration
  • 1
    TeamCity Integration
  • 1
    Parallel Testing
  • 1
    Highly Available

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Karma
Cons of TestingBot
  • 1
    Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
  • 1
    Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Karma?

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

    What is TestingBot?

    TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Karma?
    What companies use TestingBot?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Karma or TestingBot.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Karma?
    What tools integrate with TestingBot?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Karma and TestingBot?
    Jasmine
    Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
    Jest
    Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.
    Mocha
    Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.
    Protractor
    Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    See all alternatives