StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. Katalon Studio vs Protractor

Katalon Studio vs Protractor

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Protractor
Protractor
Stacks2.2K
Followers544
Votes33
GitHub Stars8.7K
Forks2.3K
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio
Stacks152
Followers177
Votes0

Katalon Studio vs Protractor: What are the differences?

Katalon Studio and Protractor are both popular testing frameworks used for automated software testing. While they have similar goals, there are key differences that set them apart from each other. Here are the main differences between Katalon Studio and Protractor: 1. **Supported platforms**: Katalon Studio is a comprehensive testing platform that supports a wide range of platforms including web, mobile, and desktop applications. On the other hand, Protractor is specifically designed for testing AngularJS applications. 2. **Programming languages**: Katalon Studio supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Groovy, and JavaScript, while Protractor primarily focuses on JavaScript. 3. **IDE integration**: Katalon Studio provides a fully integrated development environment (IDE) that includes features like recording and playback, debugging, and test case management. Protractor, on the other hand, is built on top of the JavaScript testing framework Jasmine and requires a separate IDE for development. 4. **Cross-browser testing**: Katalon Studio offers built-in support for cross-browser testing, allowing testers to easily run tests on different browsers. Protractor, on the other hand, requires additional configuration for cross-browser testing. 5. **Community support**: Katalon Studio has a large and active community of users, with many resources available such as forums, tutorials, and plugins. Protractor also has a community, but it may not be as extensive as Katalon Studio's. 6. **Target audience**: Katalon Studio is suitable for both beginners and experienced testers as it provides a user-friendly interface and extensive features. Protractor, on the other hand, is more suitable for developers and testers familiar with AngularJS.

In Summary, Katalon Studio is a comprehensive testing platform with support for multiple platforms and programming languages, integrated development environment, and extensive community support. Protractor, on the other hand, is specifically designed for testing AngularJS applications and is more suitable for developers and testers familiar with AngularJS.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Protractor, Katalon Studio

Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Protractor
Protractor
Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

Katalon Studio is a free and robust automation solution for API, Web and Mobile testing. It integrates all necessary components with built-in keywords and project templates into a complete automation framework. Katalon Studio is easy-to-use for new users but still offers advanced capabilities for experienced users. The solution is trusted by an active community of over 150K users from 150+ countries around the world.

Test Like a User; For Angular Apps; Automatic Waiting
Productive IDE for API automation; API testing centric; Built to work with modern frameworks; Sustainable and scalable platform; Minimal maintenance; Built-in project templates; Generate tests automatically; Powerful test execution mechanism; CI/CD readiness; Dynamic failure handling and automatic re-execution; Report and Debug; Test Maintenance
Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.7K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.2K
Stacks
152
Followers
544
Followers
177
Votes
33
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Quick tests implementation
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 5
    Open source
  • 5
    Promise support
Cons
  • 4
    Limited
No community feedback yet
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Angular
Angular
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Travis CI
Travis CI
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
TestLink
TestLink
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs

What are some alternatives to Protractor, Katalon Studio?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana