AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Kong

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

12.5K
8.5K
+ 1
59
Kong

657
1.5K
+ 1
139
Add tool

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) vs Kong: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare the key differences between AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Kong. Both ELB and Kong are popular tools for load balancing in web applications. However, they have distinct features and capabilities that set them apart from each other.

  1. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is a managed load balancing service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It offers high scalability and flexibility as it automatically scales according to the incoming traffic load. In contrast, Kong is an open-source API gateway that provides load balancing along with other functionalities such as authentication, rate limiting, and logging. Kong can be deployed in various environments, giving users more choice and flexibility in the setup.

  2. Integration with AWS services: ELB is tightly integrated with AWS services and cloud infrastructure. It seamlessly works with different AWS resources like EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and CloudFormation templates. ELB also supports integration with other AWS services like AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) for SSL/TLS certificates and AWS CloudTrail for logging and auditing. On the other hand, Kong is a more standalone solution that can be deployed on any infrastructure. It can integrate with various databases, message queues, and other third-party services.

  3. Granular Control and Customization: ELB provides a set of predefined load balancing algorithms, including round-robin, least connections, and IP hash. It automatically distributes incoming traffic to multiple instances based on these algorithms. However, ELB has limited customization options compared to Kong. Kong allows users to define their own load balancing algorithms and also provides advanced routing capabilities like path-based and header-based routing. This makes Kong more flexible and suitable for complex routing scenarios.

  4. Monitoring and Metrics: AWS ELB provides built-in monitoring and metrics through AWS CloudWatch. It offers metrics like request count, latency, and backend connection errors. ELB also supports integration with AWS X-Ray for distributed tracing and analysis. In contrast, Kong does not provide built-in monitoring and metrics out of the box. Users need to set up additional tools like Prometheus or Grafana to collect and analyze metrics from Kong.

  5. Service Discovery and Load Balancer Configuration: ELB supports automatic service discovery for EC2 instances within a VPC. It can dynamically register and deregister instances based on their health status. ELB automatically handles load balancer configuration and scaling. Kong, on the other hand, requires manual configuration and management of the load balancer. Users need to define the upstream services and their endpoints manually in Kong's configuration.

  6. Pricing and Cost: AWS ELB pricing is based on the usage and type of load balancer (Classic, Application, or Network). It has different pricing tiers for data transfer, requests, and load balancer capacity. Kong, being an open-source tool, does not have any direct licensing or usage costs. However, users need to consider the infrastructure and maintenance costs for hosting Kong and any associated services like databases or message queues.

In Summary, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) is a managed load balancing service offered by AWS, tightly integrated with other AWS services, providing high scalability and automation. Kong, an open-source API gateway, offers more customization options, flexibility in deployment, and better control over load balancing algorithms and routing.

Decisions about AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Kong
Prateek Mittal
Fullstack Engineer| Ruby | React JS | gRPC at Ex Bookmyshow | Furlenco | Shopmatic · | 4 upvotes · 286.8K views

Istio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn-keyIstio based on powerful Envoy whereas Kong based on Nginx. Istio is K8S native as well it's actively developed when k8s was successfully accepted with production-ready apps whereas Kong slowly migrated to start leveraging K8s. Istio has an inbuilt turn key solution with Rancher whereas Kong completely lacks here. Traffic distribution in Istio can be done via canary, a/b, shadowing, HTTP headers, ACL, whitelist whereas in Kong it's limited to canary, ACL, blue-green, proxy caching. Istio has amazing community support which is visible via Github stars or releases when comparing both.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)
Pros of Kong
  • 48
    Easy
  • 8
    ASG integration
  • 2
    Reliability
  • 1
    Coding
  • 0
    SSL offloading
  • 37
    Easy to maintain
  • 32
    Easy to install
  • 26
    Flexible
  • 21
    Great performance
  • 7
    Api blueprint
  • 4
    Custom Plugins
  • 3
    Kubernetes-native
  • 2
    Security
  • 2
    Has a good plugin infrastructure
  • 2
    Agnostic
  • 1
    Load balancing
  • 1
    Documentation is clear
  • 1
    Very customizable

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)?

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

What is Kong?

Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)?
What companies use Kong?
See which teams inside your own company are using AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) or Kong.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)?
What tools integrate with Kong?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+29
14
13395
GitHubPythonReact+42
49
40691
GitHubGitSlack+30
27
18275
GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
12
6560
What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) and Kong?
HAProxy
HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
Traefik
A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
Envoy
Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
DigitalOcean Load Balancer
Load Balancers are a highly available, fully-managed service that work right out of the box and can be deployed as fast as a Droplet. Load Balancers distribute incoming traffic across your infrastructure to increase your application's availability.
Fly
Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.
See all alternatives