Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kore vs Puma: What are the differences?
What is Kore? A fast web server for writing web apps in C. Kore is an easy to use web application framework for writing scalable web APIs in C. Its main goals are security, scalability and allowing rapid development and deployment of such APIs. Because of this Kore is an ideal candidate for building robust, scalable and secure web things.
What is Puma? A Modern, Concurrent Web Server for Ruby. Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.
Kore and Puma belong to "Web Servers" category of the tech stack.
Kore and Puma are both open source tools. Puma with 5.78K GitHub stars and 987 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Kore with 3.09K GitHub stars and 282 GitHub forks.
Pros of Kore
- SPDY2
- Super-lightweight1
- Super-fast1
- Full featured1
- HTTPS1
Pros of Puma
- Free4
- Convenient3
- Easy3
- Multithreaded2
- Consumes less memory than Unicorn2
- Default Rails server2
- First-class support for WebSockets2
- Lightweight1
- Fast1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Kore
Cons of Puma
- Uses `select` (limited client count)0