KVM vs VirtualBox vs VMware vSphere

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
VMware vSphere

+ 1
Get Advice from developers at your company using Private StackShare. Sign up for Private StackShare.
Learn More
Pros of KVM
Pros of VirtualBox
Pros of VMware vSphere
  • 4
    No license issues
  • 2
    Very fast
  • 2
    Flexible network options
  • 359
  • 231
  • 169
    Default for vagrant
  • 110
  • 73
    Starts quickly
  • 45
  • 42
    Running in background
  • 41
    Simple, yet comprehensive
  • 27
    Default for boot2docker
  • 21
    Extensive customization
  • 2
    Free to use
  • 1
  • 1
    Mouse integration
  • 1
    Easy tool
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 2
    Great Networking
  • 2
    Feature rich
  • 1
    Running in background
  • 1
    Can be setup on single physical server
  • 1

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of KVM
Cons of VirtualBox
Cons of VMware vSphere
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 6

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is KVM?

      KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

      What is VirtualBox?

      VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

      What is VMware vSphere?

      vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use KVM?
      What companies use VirtualBox?
      What companies use VMware vSphere?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with KVM?
      What tools integrate with VirtualBox?
      What tools integrate with VMware vSphere?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to KVM, VirtualBox, and VMware vSphere?
      When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.
      Virtuozzo leverages OpenVZ as its core of a virtualization solution offered by Virtuozzo company. Virtuozzo is optimized for hosters and offers hypervisor (VMs in addition to containers), distributed cloud storage, dedicated support, management tools, and easy installation.
      It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.
      The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
      LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features. Through a powerful API and simple tools, it lets Linux users easily create and manage system or application containers.
      See all alternatives