Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Browserling

12
42
+ 1
0
LambdaTest

557
196
+ 1
204
Add tool

Browserling vs LambdaTest: What are the differences?

Developers describe Browserling as "Interactive cross-browser testing". We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by and javascript. On the other hand, LambdaTest is detailed as "Perform Cross Browser Testing on 2000+ Real Browsers and Operating System Online". LambdaTest is a cloud-based testing platform and it provides access to a powerful network cloud of 2000+ real browsers and operating system that helps testers in cross-browser and cross-platform compatibility testing.

Browserling and LambdaTest belong to "Browser Testing" category of the tech stack.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Browserling
Pros of LambdaTest
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 17
      Pocket friendly pricing
    • 13
      Good Performance
    • 12
      Integration with Gitlab
    • 12
      Integration with Bitbucket
    • 12
      Cross browser testing
    • 11
      Integration with Jira
    • 11
      Great support
    • 11
      Integration with GitHub
    • 10
      Integration with Trello
    • 10
      Clean UI and Easy to use
    • 10
      Integration with Slack
    • 10
      Integration with Asana
    • 8
      Pre-installed developer tools
    • 8
      Integration with Hive
    • 8
      IE and Edge support
    • 6
      Local app testing
    • 6
      Multiple Browsers
    • 5
      Integration with Teamwork
    • 5
      Integration with VSTS
    • 4
      Real time testing feature is flawless
    • 3
      Selenium automation
    • 3
      Faster Speed
    • 3
      Up-to-date Browser collection
    • 2
      Robust Selenium Grid
    • 2
      Real devices
    • 2
      24/7 Customer Chat Support

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Browserling
    Cons of LambdaTest
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 1
        Cluttered UI
      • 1
        Steep learning curve for new users
      • 1
        Limited device support

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Browserling?

      We run the browsers on our servers. Fully interactive sessions, not static screenshots. No flash, no applets, nothing to install. Powered entirely by <canvas> and javascript.

      What is LambdaTest?

      LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Browserling?
      What companies use LambdaTest?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Browserling or LambdaTest.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Browserling?
      What tools integrate with LambdaTest?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Browserling and LambdaTest?
        BrowserStack
        BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
        CrossBrowserTesting
        It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        Karma
        Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
        Playwright
        It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
        See all alternatives