lighttpd vs Puma vs Apache Tomcat

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

lighttpd

148
133
+ 1
27
Puma

834
262
+ 1
20
Apache Tomcat

16.3K
12.2K
+ 1
201
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of lighttpd
Pros of Puma
Pros of Apache Tomcat
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Full featured
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Available modules
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Security
  • 1
    Ssl support
  • 4
    Free
  • 3
    Convenient
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Multithreaded
  • 2
    Consumes less memory than Unicorn
  • 2
    Default Rails server
  • 2
    First-class support for WebSockets
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Fast
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of lighttpd
Cons of Puma
Cons of Apache Tomcat
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 0
      Uses `select` (limited client count)
    • 2
      Blocking - each http request block a thread
    • 1
      Easy to set up

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is lighttpd?

    lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

    What is Puma?

    Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

    What is Apache Tomcat?

    Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention lighttpd, Puma, and Apache Tomcat as a desired skillset
    What companies use lighttpd?
    What companies use Puma?
    What companies use Apache Tomcat?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with lighttpd?
    What tools integrate with Puma?
    What tools integrate with Apache Tomcat?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to lighttpd, Puma, and Apache Tomcat?
      NGINX
      nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
      LiteSpeed
      It is a drop-in Apache replacement and the leading high-performance, high-scalability server. You can replace your existing Apache server with it without changing your configuration or operating system details. As a drop-in replacement, it allows you to quickly eliminate Apache bottlenecks in 15 minutes with zero downtime.
      Caddy
      Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.
      Apache HTTP Server
      The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.
      Microsoft IIS
      Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.
      See all alternatives