Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

λ Gordon

0
19
+ 1
0
LocalStack

53
134
+ 1
33
Add tool

LocalStack vs λ Gordon: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Scope: LocalStack focuses on emulating a local AWS cloud environment, allowing developers to test their applications locally without the need for internet connectivity. On the other hand, λ Gordon primarily focuses on serverless deployments to AWS cloud environments, aiding developers in managing and deploying serverless applications on AWS.

  2. Cost Management: LocalStack is free to use and is an open-source project, making it a cost-effective option for developers looking to simulate AWS functionalities locally. Conversely, λ Gordon may incur costs depending on the AWS services and resources utilized during deployment, making it important for users to monitor and manage their AWS spending.

  3. Integration Capabilities: LocalStack provides a wide range of AWS service emulations for local testing and development purposes, making it a comprehensive tool for mimicking AWS environments. In comparison, λ Gordon offers streamlined integration specifically tailored for serverless deployments, with features such as automatic CloudFormation generation and Lambda deployment simplifying the process for developers.

  4. Community Support: LocalStack has a robust community of developers contributing to its ongoing development and enhancement, providing users with a rich pool of resources and support. On the other hand, λ Gordon, while actively maintained and supported by its creators, may have a more focused community due to its specific serverless deployment functionality.

  5. Learning Curve: LocalStack can be easier for developers already familiar with AWS services, as it mirrors many of the functionalities and interfaces present in the actual AWS environment. Meanwhile, λ Gordon may have a steeper learning curve for those new to serverless deployments, requiring some time to understand its optimized workflows and deployment processes.

  6. Monitoring and Debugging: LocalStack offers debugging capabilities and visibility into local AWS service interactions, allowing developers to troubleshoot issues effectively during testing. In contrast, λ Gordon provides monitoring features tailored for serverless applications deployed on AWS, enabling users to track performance metrics and troubleshoot issues specific to serverless architectures.

In Summary, LocalStack primarily focuses on emulating a local AWS environment for testing, whereas λ Gordon specializes in serverless deployments to AWS cloud environments, offering streamlined integration and monitoring features.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of λ Gordon
Pros of LocalStack
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 4
      Integration with Python/nosetests
    • 4
      Local/offline testing
    • 4
      No dependency on cloud
    • 3
      Available as Docker image
    • 3
      Continuous integration
    • 3
      The correct URL is https://github.com/localstack/locals
    • 3
      Integration with Java/JUnit
    • 3
      Increases dev speed
    • 3
      Easy to use
    • 3
      Cost effective testing

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of λ Gordon
    Cons of LocalStack
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 2
        Doesn't work well on Windows
      • 1
        No proper admin panel/web UI

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is λ Gordon?

      Gordon is a tool to create, wire and deploy AWS Lambdas using CloudFormation

      What is LocalStack?

      LocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use λ Gordon?
      What companies use LocalStack?
        No companies found
        See which teams inside your own company are using λ Gordon or LocalStack.
        Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with λ Gordon?
        What tools integrate with LocalStack?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to λ Gordon and LocalStack?
        AWS Amplify
        A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.
        AWS CLI
        It is a unified tool to manage your AWS services. With just one tool to download and configure, you can control multiple AWS services from the command line and automate them through scripts.
        Bash-My-AWS
        It is a simple but extremely powerful set of CLI commands for managing resources on Amazon Web Services. They harness the power of Amazon's AWSCLI, while abstracting away verbosity. The project implements some innovative patterns but (arguably) remains simple, beautiful and readable.
        AWS Shell
        The AWS Command Line Interface is a unified tool to manage your AWS services.
        troposphere
        The troposphere library allows for easier creation of the AWS CloudFormation JSON by writing Python code to describe the AWS resources. troposphere also includes some basic support for OpenStack resources via Heat.
        See all alternatives