Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

jQuery

189.9K
66.6K
+ 1
6.6K
Marko

24
50
+ 1
39
Add tool

Marko vs jQuery: What are the differences?

  1. Syntax: Marko uses a declarative syntax that resembles HTML, while jQuery relies on a more imperative approach using JavaScript for DOM manipulation.
  2. Performance: Marko is known for its high performance, optimized for server-side rendering and efficient re-renders, whereas jQuery can be slower due to its extensive use of querying and manipulating the DOM.
  3. Modularity: Marko promotes a modular architecture with components as the building blocks of the UI, providing better organization and reusability, whereas jQuery lacks clear structure and modularity for complex applications.
  4. Learning Curve: Marko requires a learning curve due to its unique syntax and concepts, whereas jQuery is easier to grasp for beginners familiar with JavaScript and HTML.
  5. Client-Side vs Server-Side: Marko is primarily a server-side technology for rendering UI components efficiently, while jQuery focuses on client-side scripting for enhancing user interactions within a web page.
  6. Tooling and Ecosystem: Marko has a smaller ecosystem and fewer third-party plugins compared to jQuery, which has an extensive range of plugins and tools available for various web development tasks.

In Summary, Marko and jQuery differ in syntax, performance, modularity, learning curve, client-side/server-side focus, and ecosystem support.

Decisions about jQuery and Marko
Peter Schmalfeldt
Senior Software Engineer · | 9 upvotes · 62.7K views

I have made an extended effort to drop frameworks completely if they are not actually needed. While I still use JS Frameworks like Vue, Angular and React ( if I have too ), I see far too often devs / teams deciding to build a single page site entirely in a framework, rather than just using HTML, CSS and a little JS.

I personally feel it's important to know when a framework is a good solution, and maybe when it's overkill.

See more
Malek Boubakri
Web developer at Quicktext · | 0 upvote · 207.8K views

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

See more
kazi shahin
CTO at Blubird Interactive Ltd. · | 3 upvotes · 101K views

I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?

See more
Manatsawin Hanmongkolchai
Chose
jQueryjQuery
over
ReactReact
in

When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.

I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.

Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.

I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of jQuery
Pros of Marko
  • 1.3K
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
  • 459
    Easy
  • 395
    Popular
  • 350
    Feature-rich
  • 281
    Html5
  • 227
    Light weight
  • 93
    Simple
  • 84
    Great community
  • 79
    CSS3 Compliant
  • 69
    Mobile friendly
  • 67
    Fast
  • 43
    Intuitive
  • 42
    Swiss Army knife for webdev
  • 35
    Huge Community
  • 11
    Easy to learn
  • 4
    Clean code
  • 3
    Because of Ajax request :)
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 2
    Nice
  • 2
    Just awesome
  • 2
    Used everywhere
  • 1
    Improves productivity
  • 1
    Javascript
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
  • 1
    It Just Works
  • 1
    Industry acceptance
  • 1
    Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 1
    I love jQuery
  • 6
    Simplicity
  • 5
    Better than React, Vue, etc
  • 5
    Speed
  • 5
    No JSX
  • 4
    Components
  • 4
    HTML markup
  • 4
    Performance
  • 2
    Data Flow
  • 1
    Documentation
  • 1
    Low CPU cost
  • 1
    Isomorphic
  • 1
    Virtual DOM

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of jQuery
Cons of Marko
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
  • 1
    Extensibility
  • 1
    Unit test
  • 1
    Mobile native

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is jQuery?

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

What is Marko?

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use jQuery?
What companies use Marko?
See which teams inside your own company are using jQuery or Marko.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with jQuery?
What tools integrate with Marko?
    No integrations found

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to jQuery and Marko?
    Bootstrap
    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    AngularJS
    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.
    jQuery Mobile
    jQuery Mobile is a HTML5-based user interface system designed to make responsive web sites and apps that are accessible on all smartphone, tablet and desktop devices.
    See all alternatives