StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Rocket

Material Design for Angular vs Rocket

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K
Rocket
Rocket
Stacks91
Followers176
Votes12

Material Design for Angular vs Rocket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Material Design for Angular and Rocket are two popular design systems used in web development. Here are the key differences between the two:

1. **Component Library**: Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of UI components such as buttons, cards, and dialogs, following Google's Material Design guidelines. In contrast, Rocket offers a more minimalistic approach with a smaller but versatile component library focused on utility and flexibility.

2. **Theming and Styling**: Material Design for Angular includes a robust theming system that allows easy customization of color schemes and typography, ensuring consistent branding across applications. Rocket, on the other hand, opts for a more opinionated styling approach with predefined themes and styles to maintain a cohesive design language.

3. **Animation**: Material Design for Angular features intricate animations and transitions that adhere to Material Design principles, providing a rich interactive experience for users. Rocket, however, focuses on simplicity and performance, with more streamlined animations to ensure smooth user interactions without unnecessary frills.

4. **Documentation and Support**: Material Design for Angular benefits from extensive documentation and official support from Google, making it easier for developers to implement and troubleshoot components. Rocket, while user-friendly, may have more limited documentation and community support, requiring developers to rely more on experimentation and exploration.

5. **Community Ecosystem**: Material Design for Angular has a large and active community of developers contributing plugins, extensions, and resources to enhance the framework's capabilities. In comparison, Rocket's community ecosystem may be smaller or more niche, potentially limiting the availability of third-party integrations and resources.

6. **Target Audience**: Material Design for Angular is best suited for projects that demand a visually rich and interactive user interface, making it ideal for applications with complex design requirements. Rocket, on the other hand, caters to projects looking for a lightweight and efficient design system that prioritizes functionality and performance over elaborate visual elements.

In Summary, Material Design for Angular and Rocket differ in their component libraries, theming approaches, animations, documentation, community ecosystems, and target audiences, catering to distinct design preferences and project requirements in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Rocket
Rocket

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Rocket is a web framework for Rust that makes it simple to write fast web applications without sacrificing flexibility or type safety. All with minimal code.

-
From request to response Rocket ensures that your types mean something; Boilerplate free; Easy to use; Extensible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11.8K
Stacks
91
Followers
9.6K
Followers
176
Votes
522
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Uses all the rust features extensively
  • 1
    Provides nice abstractions
  • 1
    Inbuilt templating feature
  • 1
    Django analog in rust
Cons
  • 1
    Only runs in nightly
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Material Design for Angular, Rocket?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase