Material Design for Bootstrap vs Skeleton: What are the differences?
Material Design for Bootstrap and Skeleton can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
Some of the features offered by Material Design for Bootstrap are:
- Input fields (text, numeric, email, etc)
- Buttons (ripple effect working)
On the other hand, Skeleton provides the following key features:
- Responsive Grid Down To Mobile
- Fast to Start
- Style Agnostic
"Bootstrap" is the top reason why over 14 developers like Material Design for Bootstrap, while over 7 developers mention "Minimalist" as the leading cause for choosing Skeleton.
Material Design for Bootstrap and Skeleton are both open source tools. It seems that Material Design for Bootstrap with 19.9K GitHub stars and 3.31K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Skeleton with 16.8K GitHub stars and 2.93K GitHub forks.
Ledger Note, Spirit Pixels™, and emotion.me are some of the popular companies that use Skeleton, whereas Material Design for Bootstrap is used by MXD3D, Itbid, and TypeLead. Skeleton has a broader approval, being mentioned in 8 company stacks & 3 developers stacks; compared to Material Design for Bootstrap, which is listed in 5 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
What is Material Design for Bootstrap?
What is Skeleton?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Material Design for Bootstrap?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Material Design for Bootstrap?
What tools integrate with Skeleton?
Like Bootstrap, It offers the same CSS framework service (Which I prefer to say cheatsheet ;)) but less complex and cleaner look and to the point.
I used it for some private stuff lately where I only needed a grid and was looking for the leanest framework there is.