Material-UI vs Mobiscroll

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Mobiscroll

Stacks8

Followers22

Votes0

GitHub Stars1.5K

Forks436

Material-UI vs Mobiscroll: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Material-UI and Mobiscroll, highlighting the key differences between the two technologies. Material-UI is a popular React component library that follows Google's Material Design guidelines, while Mobiscroll is a mobile-first UI/UX framework that offers ready-to-use components for both web and mobile applications.

Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the principles of Google's Material Design, providing a clean and modern visual language with a focus on usability and accessibility. On the other hand, Mobiscroll is designed for mobile-first experiences, offering a touch-optimized interface with a wide variety of mobile-specific components.
Component Variety: Material-UI provides a comprehensive set of components for building responsive web applications, including buttons, cards, forms, navigation, and more. It also offers a rich set of community-created component libraries. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, specializes in mobile-specific components such as date pickers, time pickers, calendars, and sliders, which can be easily integrated into both web and mobile apps.
Customization Options: Material-UI offers a high level of customization, allowing developers to customize the appearance of components through theme customization and CSS overrides. It provides a theming solution that enables consistent branding across the entire application. In contrast, Mobiscroll provides a range of customization options through its API, including custom CSS classes, appearance tweaks, and localization settings.
Integration with Frameworks: Material-UI is primarily built for React and provides extensive support for React features and libraries. It integrates smoothly with popular state management libraries like Redux and follows React best practices. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be easily integrated into popular JavaScript frameworks like Angular, Vue.js, and jQuery.
Documentation and Community Support: Material-UI has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and code examples. It has a dedicated team maintaining the library and provides regular updates. Mobiscroll also has a supportive community, but the documentation may not be as extensive as Material-UI, and the frequency of updates might vary.
Pricing Model: Material-UI is an open-source library and is free to use, even for commercial projects. It offers a rich ecosystem of third-party integrations and plugins that are also open-source. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, follows a commercial licensing model, offering both free and paid plans based on usage and support requirements.

In summary, Material-UI and Mobiscroll differ in their design philosophies, component variety, customization options, framework integration, documentation and community support, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Mobiscroll

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Mobiscroll
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	It is a UI library for progressive web-apps and hybrid development. Created with a lot of attention to usability and performance.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	Calendar; Text input fields; Responsive grid layout; Page styling and typography; Segmented control; Progress indicator
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 1.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 436
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 8
Followers 3.7K	Followers 22
Votes 445	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table	No community feedback yet
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	JavaScript AngularJS React Greenhouse Atatus Backand jQuery UI StackBlitz

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Mobiscroll?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Related Comparisons

Material-UI vs Mobiscroll: What are the differences?

Introduction

Design Philosophy: Material-UI follows the principles of Google's Material Design, providing a clean and modern visual language with a focus on usability and accessibility. On the other hand, Mobiscroll is designed for mobile-first experiences, offering a touch-optimized interface with a wide variety of mobile-specific components.
Component Variety: Material-UI provides a comprehensive set of components for building responsive web applications, including buttons, cards, forms, navigation, and more. It also offers a rich set of community-created component libraries. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, specializes in mobile-specific components such as date pickers, time pickers, calendars, and sliders, which can be easily integrated into both web and mobile apps.
Customization Options: Material-UI offers a high level of customization, allowing developers to customize the appearance of components through theme customization and CSS overrides. It provides a theming solution that enables consistent branding across the entire application. In contrast, Mobiscroll provides a range of customization options through its API, including custom CSS classes, appearance tweaks, and localization settings.
Integration with Frameworks: Material-UI is primarily built for React and provides extensive support for React features and libraries. It integrates smoothly with popular state management libraries like Redux and follows React best practices. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be easily integrated into popular JavaScript frameworks like Angular, Vue.js, and jQuery.
Documentation and Community Support: Material-UI has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and code examples. It has a dedicated team maintaining the library and provides regular updates. Mobiscroll also has a supportive community, but the documentation may not be as extensive as Material-UI, and the frequency of updates might vary.
Pricing Model: Material-UI is an open-source library and is free to use, even for commercial projects. It offers a rich ecosystem of third-party integrations and plugins that are also open-source. Mobiscroll, on the other hand, follows a commercial licensing model, offering both free and paid plans based on usage and support requirements.

In summary, Material-UI and Mobiscroll differ in their design philosophies, component variety, customization options, framework integration, documentation and community support, and pricing models.

Material-UI vs Mobiscroll

Overview