StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Material-UI vs styled-components

Material-UI vs styled-components

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Material-UI
Material-UI
Stacks2.7K
Followers3.7K
Votes445
styled-components
styled-components
Stacks2.6K
Followers608
Votes12
GitHub Stars41.0K
Forks2.5K

Material-UI vs styled-components: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Material-UI and styled-components

Material-UI and styled-components are both popular libraries used for building user interfaces in React applications. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Styling Approach: Material-UI follows a component-based styling approach where each component has its own set of predefined CSS styles. These styles can be customized using inline styles or overridden using the classes prop. On the other hand, styled-components use a CSS-in-JS approach where styles are defined as JavaScript template literals. This allows for more dynamic styling based on React props and state.

  2. Scoping: Material-UI provides a built-in theme provider which allows for easy theming of the entire application. Styles defined in Material-UI components are automatically scoped to that component or theme. styled-components also offer scoping through the use of the component-based approach. Each styled component generates a unique class name and styles are automatically scoped to that component's DOM node.

  3. CSS Features: Material-UI provides a rich set of predefined CSS styles and components that are designed following the Material Design guidelines. These styles are responsive, accessible, and have extensive customization options. styled-components, on the other hand, allows developers to leverage all the features of CSS, including animations, media queries, and pseudo-classes. This gives more flexibility in terms of styling options.

  4. Overhead: Material-UI is a larger library compared to styled-components as it contains a wide range of components, styles, and pre-built functionality. This can result in a larger bundle size and initial loading time. styled-components are generally lightweight as they only include the styles explicitly defined by the developer. This can lead to a smaller bundle size and potentially faster loading times.

  5. Integration with Design Systems: Material-UI is specifically designed to adhere to the Material Design guidelines and integrates well with other Material-UI components. It provides a cohesive and consistent design language for building applications. styled-components, on the other hand, can be used to create completely custom design systems with unique visual styles tailored to the specific needs of the application.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Material-UI has a large and active community with extensive documentation, examples, and third-party integrations. It is widely adopted and has a wide range of resources available for developers. styled-components also have a growing community and an active ecosystem, but it may not be as extensive as Material-UI.

In summary, Material-UI and styled-components differ in terms of their styling approach, scoping mechanism, CSS features, overhead, integration with design systems, and community support. Making a choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the developer's preference.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Material-UI, styled-components

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

767k views767k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI
Material-UI
styled-components
styled-components

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
41.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
2.6K
Followers
3.7K
Followers
608
Votes
445
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 141
    React
  • 82
    Material Design
  • 60
    Ui components
  • 30
    CSS framework
  • 26
    Component
Cons
  • 36
    Hard to learn. Bad documentation
  • 29
    Hard to customize
  • 22
    Hard to understand Docs
  • 9
    Bad performance
  • 7
    For editable table component need to use material-table
Pros
  • 11
    Very easy to use and integrate
  • 1
    Huihui
Integrations
React
React
Emotion
Emotion
Next.js
Next.js
Node.js
Node.js
React
React

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, styled-components?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase