Materialize vs. Polymer vs. Mozilla Brick
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats |
|||||||||
GitHub Stats |
|||||||||
Description |
What is Materialize?A CSS Framework based on material design.
|
What is Polymer?Polymer is a new type of library for the web, designed to leverage the existing browser infrastructure to provide the encapsulation and extendability currently only available in JS libraries. Polymer is based on a set of future technologies, including Shadow DOM, Custom Elements and Model Driven Views. Currently these technologies are implemented as polyfills or shims, but as browsers adopt these features natively, the platform code that drives Polymer evacipates, leaving only the value-adds.
|
What is Mozilla Brick?Brick is a collection of UI components designed for the easy and quick building of web application UIs. Brick components are built using the Web Components standard to allow developers to describe the UI of their app using the HTML syntax they already know.
|
||||||
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community! |
|||||||||
Pros |
|
|
|
||||||
Cons |
|
|
|
||||||
Pricing |
How much does Materialize cost?
|
How much does Polymer cost?
|
How much does Mozilla Brick cost?
|
||||||
Companies |
What companies use Materialize?
58 companies on StackShare use Materialize
|
What companies use Polymer?
51 companies on StackShare use Polymer
|
What companies use Mozilla Brick?
0 companies on StackShare use Mozilla Brick
|
||||||
What are some alternatives to Materialize, Polymer, and Mozilla Brick?
|
|||||||||
Related Comparisons
Interest Over Time
Reviews of Materialize, Polymer, and Mozilla Brick
-
ConsoleTVsMaterialize Review
January 05, 2015 09:30
I've been using materialize and I'm really happy with it, in some months I'm sure it will become one of the best front-end frameworks around the internet, because it's easy and fast to use and to get started with it.
It also got a nice community of developers that help developing it and finding bugs, as well a translation team, looking to get materialize into the major countries.
My final review is that is one of the best front-end frameworks I've ever found and get used really fast and it's one of the most comfortable frameworks to use as well.
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support -
grigbPretty, but limited (v1.0.0-alpha.3)
February 13, 2018 12:36
As I've been applying Materialize, I've discovered some limitations.
For example, the tabs require ids for the content divs. This makes is difficult to create content dynamically.
The documentation is not accurate.
To use materializecss, you will need to review the source code often.
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support -
grigb
Pretty, but limited (v1.0.0-alpha.3)
February 13, 2018 14:56
As I've been applying Materialize, I've discovered some limitations.
The Glitter page: https://gitter.im/Dogfalo/materialize provided excellent support though. Kudos!
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support -
MathieuMorrissetteAwesome
June 30, 2015 17:21
It is very easy to use. Very good community and documentation :P. Keep up the good work.
Ease of Use Documentation Reliability Support
How developers use Materialize vs Polymer vs Mozilla Brick
-
anasancho uses Polymer
In process of Learning Technics- Studing to know more. I was introduced in a Google event.
Polymer is another Google offering that focuses on Web Components, an up-and-coming collection of technologies that provide web developers with the ability to create customer HTML elements.
-
Badge List uses Polymer
Polymer is super future-focused and really great to build in. The biggest plus for us is how its component-focused approach keeps things modular and maintainable. It also makes it really easy to implement material design.
-
-
-
-
