Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GoCD

205
326
+ 1
206
Apache Maven

2.8K
1.7K
+ 1
414
Add tool

Apache Maven vs Go.CD: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Apache Maven and Go.CD are both popular tools used in the field of continuous integration and continuous deployment. While both serve the purpose of automating the software delivery process, they differ in various aspects. Below are the key differences between Apache Maven and Go.CD:

1. **Build Management**:
Apache Maven focuses on project management and build automation, providing a standard way to build projects by defining project structure, dependencies, and plugins in a XML format. Go.CD, on the other hand, primarily focuses on continuous delivery and orchestration of the deployment pipeline.

2. **Language Support**:
Apache Maven is primarily used for building Java projects and manages dependencies for Java-based projects. In contrast, Go.CD is a more language-agnostic tool and can be used with a variety of programming languages and frameworks, making it versatile in different development environments.

3. **Integration and Plugins**:
Apache Maven has a wide range of plugins available to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools such as version control systems, IDEs, and build servers. Go.CD also supports plugins, but its emphasis is more on integration with deployment and testing tools to streamline the continuous delivery process.

4. **User Interface**:
Apache Maven is mainly command-line driven, with limited graphical user interface (GUI) capabilities, making it more suitable for command-line enthusiasts. In contrast, Go.CD provides a user-friendly web-based interface that allows for easy visualization and management of the deployment pipelines.

5. **Workflow Configuration**:
Apache Maven follows a convention-over-configuration approach, providing pre-defined lifecycle phases and standard project structures. Go.CD offers more flexibility in defining custom workflows and pipelines based on specific project requirements, allowing for more customized CI/CD processes.

6. **Scalability and Performance**:
In terms of scalability, Apache Maven may face limitations when dealing with large-scale projects and complex build configurations due to its reliance on XML configuration files. Go.CD is designed to handle complex build and deployment pipelines efficiently, making it a better choice for organizations with intricate CI/CD needs.

## Summary

In summary, Apache Maven is a robust build management tool with a focus on Java projects, while Go.CD is a versatile continuous delivery tool with support for various programming languages and more advanced workflow customization capabilities.
Advice on GoCD and Apache Maven
Mohammad Hossein Amri
Chief Technology Officer at Planally · | 3 upvotes · 492.7K views
Needs advice
on
GoCDGoCD
and
JenkinsJenkins

I'm open to anything. just want something that break less and doesn't need me to pay for it, and can be hosted on Docker. our scripting language is powershell core. so it's better to support it. also we are building dotnet core in our pipeline, so if they have anything related that helps with the CI would be nice.

See more
Replies (1)
Ankit Malik
Software Developer at CloudCover · | 1 upvotes · 475.4K views
Recommends
on
Google Cloud BuildGoogle Cloud Build

Google cloud build can help you. It is hosted on cloud and also provide reasonable free quota.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GoCD
Pros of Apache Maven
  • 31
    Open source
  • 27
    Pipeline dependencies
  • 25
    Pipeline structures
  • 22
    Can run jobs in parallel
  • 20
    Very flexible
  • 15
    Plugin architecture
  • 13
    Environments can keep config secure
  • 12
    Great UI
  • 10
    Good user roles and permissions
  • 9
    Supports many material dependencies
  • 7
    Fan-in, Fan-out
  • 6
    Designed for cd not just ci
  • 4
    Empowers product people to make delivery decisions
  • 2
    Flexible & easy deployment
  • 2
    Pass around artifacts
  • 1
    Build once
  • 138
    Dependency management
  • 70
    Necessary evil
  • 60
    I’d rather code my app, not my build
  • 48
    Publishing packaged artifacts
  • 43
    Convention over configuration
  • 18
    Modularisation
  • 11
    Consistency across builds
  • 6
    Prevents overengineering using scripting
  • 4
    Runs Tests
  • 4
    Lot of cool plugins
  • 3
    Extensible
  • 2
    Hard to customize
  • 2
    Runs on Linux
  • 1
    Runs on OS X
  • 1
    Slow incremental build
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 1
    Undeterminisc
  • 1
    Good IDE tooling

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GoCD
Cons of Apache Maven
  • 2
    Lack of plugins
  • 2
    Horrible ui
  • 1
    No support
  • 6
    Complex
  • 1
    Inconsistent buillds
  • 0
    Not many plugin-alternatives

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is GoCD?

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

What is Apache Maven?

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use GoCD?
What companies use Apache Maven?
See which teams inside your own company are using GoCD or Apache Maven.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with GoCD?
What tools integrate with Apache Maven?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to GoCD and Apache Maven?
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
GitLab CI
GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
Bamboo
Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
TeamCity
TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
Concourse
Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.
See all alternatives