Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Meistertask vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?
Introduction: In this comparison, we will explore key differences between Meistertask and Microsoft Teams.
User Interface: Meistertask offers a clean and intuitive user interface with easy navigation between projects and tasks. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, has a more complex interface due to its extensive collaboration features, including chat, meetings, and file sharing.
Task Management: Meistertask focuses on task management, allowing users to create detailed tasks with subtasks, due dates, and attachments in a Kanban-style layout. Microsoft Teams includes task management features within its application, but it is more integrated with its chat and collaboration tools.
Integration Capabilities: Meistertask offers integration with various third-party tools such as Slack, Google Drive, and Dropbox to enhance productivity. Microsoft Teams, as part of the larger Microsoft 365 suite, integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft applications like Outlook, SharePoint, and OneDrive.
Team Collaboration: Microsoft Teams excels in team collaboration by offering real-time communication through chat, video calls, and screen sharing. Meistertask, while having collaborative features, is more focused on task organization rather than communication within a team.
Customization Options: Meistertask allows users to customize their project boards with different backgrounds, labels, and tags to suit their preferences. Microsoft Teams provides customization options through the use of channels, tabs, and connectors to tailor the workspace for different teams and projects.
Mobile Accessibility: Meistertask offers a mobile app for both iOS and Android devices, allowing users to manage tasks on-the-go. Microsoft Teams also has a mobile app for seamless collaboration and communication outside of the office environment.
In Summary, Meistertask and Microsoft Teams differ in user interface simplicity, task management focus, integration capabilities, team collaboration tools, customization options, and mobile accessibility.
As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.
Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.
- Slack
We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.
- Microsoft Teams
We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.
we were using slack
and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.
on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.
we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.
Pros of MeisterTask
- Agile1
- Slack integration1
Pros of Microsoft Teams
- Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow29
- Mobile friendly24
- Free19
- Well-thought Design12
- Great integrations12
- Channels10
- Easy setup9
- Unlimited users6
- Strong search and data archiving5
- Easy to integrate with5
- Multi domain switching support4
- Web interface4
- Same interface on multiple platforms3
- Great voice quality2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MeisterTask
Cons of Microsoft Teams
- Confusing UI17
- Bad performance on init and after quite a use12
- Bad Usermanagement10
- No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)6
- Can't see all members in a video meeting6
- Unable to Mute users5
- No Markdown Support5
- You don't really own your messages4
- MIssing public channels4
- Forced WYSIWYG4
- Stubborn, unused friendly3
- Challenging Onboarding3
- No linux support3
- Audio support problems1