Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Gin Gonic vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Key Difference 1: Routing mechanism - Gin Gonic is a Go web framework that focuses on simplicity and high performance. It uses a routing mechanism that is based on the HTTP request method and path, allowing developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests accordingly. On the other hand, Next.js is a JavaScript framework for building React applications that includes a built-in routing system. It allows developers to create dynamic routes using file-based routing, where each file in the pages directory represents a route. This makes it easier to manage and organize routes in Next.js compared to Gin Gonic.
Key Difference 2: Server-side rendering - Gin Gonic primarily focuses on server-side development, providing an efficient framework for building APIs and web services. It does not have built-in support for server-side rendering (SSR) of web pages. Contrastingly, Next.js is designed to enable server-side rendering out of the box, allowing developers to render React components on the server before sending the HTML to the client. This enhances performance and improves SEO by ensuring that web pages are fully rendered on the server before being delivered to the browser.
Key Difference 3: Language and ecosystem - Gin Gonic is built for the Go programming language and leverages its features, including Goroutines and channels, to achieve high performance. It is tightly integrated with the Go ecosystem, making it straightforward to use popular Go libraries and tools. Next.js, on the other hand, is based on JavaScript and utilizes the React framework. It benefits from the extensive JavaScript ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage a wide range of libraries and tools to enhance their development workflow.
Key Difference 4: Templating and UI framework - Gin Gonic does not include a built-in templating engine or UI framework. It focuses on providing a lightweight and performant framework for handling HTTP requests and building APIs. However, it can be easily integrated with popular Go templating engines and UI frameworks, giving developers the flexibility to choose their preferred tools. In contrast, Next.js offers support for server-side rendering of React components, which inherently provides a powerful UI framework. It includes features like server-side rendering, static site generation, and incremental static regeneration, making it a comprehensive solution for building dynamic and interactive UIs.
Key Difference 5: Deployment options - Gin Gonic is designed to be a standalone web framework that can be deployed on any server that supports Go. It provides flexibility in terms of deployment options and can be deployed as a traditional server or in a containerized environment like Docker. Next.js, on the other hand, is a framework specifically designed for building web applications and is typically deployed on serverless platforms like Vercel (formerly known as Zeit) or as a Node.js server. It offers seamless integration with these platforms and provides features like automatic scaling and deployment previews.
Key Difference 6: Community and support - Gin Gonic has gained popularity in the Go community and has a dedicated user base. It is actively maintained and has a vibrant ecosystem with various open-source libraries and plugins available. However, being primarily focused on Go, its community size is relatively smaller compared to JavaScript frameworks like Next.js. Next.js has a large and active community, providing extensive support and resources. The community-driven development and widespread adoption of Next.js make it easier for developers to find documentation, tutorials, and solutions to common problems.
In Summary, Gin Gonic is a lightweight and high-performance Go web framework with flexible deployment options and a dedicated user base, while Next.js is a JavaScript framework for building React applications that includes built-in routing, server-side rendering, and a comprehensive UI framework, benefiting from the extensive JavaScript ecosystem and a large and active community.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Gin Gonic
- Hight performance11
- Open source5
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Gin Gonic
- Low performance2
- No wildcard routing1
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9