Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Grails vs Next.js: What are the differences?
Language and Platform: Grails is built on top of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) and uses the Groovy programming language, while Next.js is built on JavaScript and runs on Node.js. This difference in language and platform affects the development workflow and the type of applications that can be built using these frameworks.
Architecture and Structure: Grails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern for organizing code and separating concerns, whereas Next.js uses a file-based routing system that simplifies the creation of pages and components. This difference in architecture influences how developers structure their applications and manage the flow of data.
Performance and Scalability: Grails, being built on the JVM, offers better performance and scalability for enterprise-level applications that require high reliability and speed. In contrast, Next.js, being a lightweight framework based on JavaScript, is more suitable for smaller projects and front-end development.
Community and Ecosystem: Grails has a mature and established community with a wide range of plugins and libraries available for developers to use. Next.js, on the other hand, has a growing community and an ecosystem centered around React and the Node.js community, offering different sets of tools and resources.
Deployment and Hosting: Grails applications are typically deployed on a traditional application server like Apache Tomcat or Jetty, while Next.js applications can be easily hosted on any server that supports Node.js. This difference in deployment options can impact the choice of hosting providers and the overall deployment process.
Learning Curve and Documentation: Grails, with its Java and Groovy background, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these languages. Next.js, being based on JavaScript, may be easier for front-end developers to pick up, with comprehensive documentation and resources available for learning.
In Summary, Grails and Next.js differ in language, architecture, performance, community, deployment, and learning curve, catering to different types of projects and developer preferences in web development.
We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.
We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.
You can read all about it in our linked blog post.
Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.
Hey guys,
My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!
Pros of Grails
- Groovy56
- Jvm40
- Rapid development38
- Gorm37
- Web framework30
- Open source25
- Plugins21
- Extensible17
- Easy17
- Dynamic14
- Clean architecture (Dependency Injection)6
- Gradle6
- Clear what everything does, lots of options5
- RAD4
- Agile4
- Great documentation4
- Android3
- Spring3
- Easy setup2
- Java web apps with steroid1
Pros of Next.js
- Automatic server rendering and code splitting49
- Built with React43
- Easy setup33
- TypeScript26
- Universal JavaScript24
- Zero setup22
- Static site generator21
- Simple deployment12
- Just JavaScript12
- Incremental static regeneration12
- Filesystem as an API10
- Frictionless development10
- Everything is a function9
- Well Documented9
- Has many examples and integrations8
- Testing8
- Isomorphic React applications7
- File based routing + hooks built in4
- Deployment2
- SEO1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Grails
- Frequent breaking changes3
- Undocumented features2
Cons of Next.js
- Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)9