Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

HashiCorp Boundary

22
40
+ 1
0
Oathkeeper

4
14
+ 1
0
Add tool

HashiCorp Boundary vs Oathkeeper: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between HashiCorp Boundary and Oathkeeper:

1. **Authentication Mechanisms**: Boundary provides a comprehensive approach to user authentication, including support for multiple authentication methods such as OIDC, LDAP, and GitHub authentication. On the other hand, Oathkeeper focuses primarily on OAuth2 for securing APIs and services, with less emphasis on traditional user authentication methods.

2. **Access Control Policies**: HashiCorp Boundary emphasizes role-based access control (RBAC) and fine-grained access policies that can be defined at the project, user, or resource level. In contrast, Oathkeeper offers a more simplistic approach to access control with pre-defined rules for enforcing access policies.

3. **Scalability and Performance**: Boundary is designed to handle large-scale deployments and supports horizontal scaling for improved performance. Oathkeeper, while efficient for smaller setups, may face scalability challenges when used in high-traffic environments due to its architecture limitations.

4. **Integration Capabilities**: HashiCorp Boundary offers seamless integration with other HashiCorp tools like Vault and Consul for enhanced security and policy management. Oathkeeper, on the other hand, is more focused on integration with OAuth2 providers and may require additional effort for integrating with other tools in the ecosystem.

5. **Open Source Community Support**: Oathkeeper has a more active open-source community contributing to its development and providing support for users. In contrast, Boundary, being a relatively newer offering, is still building its community and may have limited resources compared to Oathkeeper.

6. **Use Cases and Target Audience**: HashiCorp Boundary is geared towards secure access management for modern infrastructure environments, suited for organizations with complex network architectures. Oathkeeper, with its API-centric approach, is better suited for application developers and teams looking to secure their APIs and services with OAuth2 standards.

In Summary, the key differences between HashiCorp Boundary and Oathkeeper lie in their authentication mechanisms, access control policies, scalability and performance, integration capabilities, open-source community support, use cases, and target audience.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More

What is HashiCorp Boundary?

Simple and secure remote access — to any system anywhere based on trusted identity. It enables practitioners and operators to securely access dynamic hosts and services with fine-grained authorization without requiring direct network access.

What is Oathkeeper?

A cloud native Identity & Access Proxy (IAP) which authenticates and authorizes incoming HTTP requests. Inspired by the BeyondCorp / Zero Trust white paper. Written in Go.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use HashiCorp Boundary?
What companies use Oathkeeper?
    No companies found
    See which teams inside your own company are using HashiCorp Boundary or Oathkeeper.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with HashiCorp Boundary?
    What tools integrate with Oathkeeper?
    What are some alternatives to HashiCorp Boundary and Oathkeeper?
    AWS IAM
    It enables you to manage access to AWS services and resources securely. Using IAM, you can create and manage AWS users and groups, and use permissions to allow and deny their access to AWS resources.
    Teleport
    Teleport makes it easy for users to securely access infrastructure and meet the toughest compliance requirements. Teleport replaces shared credentials with short-lived certificates and is completely transparent to client-side tools.
    SailPoint
    It provides enterprise identity governance solutions with on-premises and cloud-based identity management software for the most complex challenges.
    AWS Service Catalog
    AWS Service Catalog allows IT administrators to create, manage, and distribute catalogs of approved products to end users, who can then access the products they need in a personalized portal. Administrators can control which users have access to each application or AWS resource to enforce compliance with organizational business policies. AWS Service Catalog allows your organization to benefit from increased agility and reduced costs because end users can find and launch only the products they need from a catalog that you control.
    Infra
    It enables you to discover and access infrastructure (e.g. Kubernetes, databases). We help you connect an identity provider such as Okta or Azure active directory, and map users/groups with the permissions you set to your infrastructure.
    See all alternatives