Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Guardian

7
17
+ 1
0
OAuth.io

21
145
+ 1
12
Add tool

Guardian vs OAuth.io: What are the differences?

  1. Authentication Protocol: The key difference between Guardian and OAuth.io lies in their authentication protocol. Guardian primarily uses JSON Web Token (JWT) for authentication, providing a stateless and secure way to authenticate users. On the other hand, OAuth.io focuses on standard OAuth protocols for authentication, enabling users to grant access to third-party applications without sharing their passwords.

  2. Customization and Control: Another notable difference is the level of customization and control offered by both platforms. Guardian allows developers to have more control over the authentication process by providing customizable authentication flows and options. In contrast, OAuth.io simplifies the process by handling the complexity of OAuth protocols, limiting the customization options available to developers.

  3. Supported Platforms: Guardian is primarily designed for integration with Elixir and Phoenix frameworks, offering seamless authentication solutions within these environments. In comparison, OAuth.io supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, making it a versatile choice for developers working across different technologies and frameworks.

  4. Ease of Implementation: When it comes to ease of implementation, Guardian is known for its simplicity and straightforward setup process, making it ideal for developers looking for a quick and efficient authentication solution. Conversely, OAuth.io may require more configuration and setup due to its support for various OAuth protocols and platforms, which can lead to a steeper learning curve for developers.

  5. Community and Support: The level of community engagement and support differs between Guardian and OAuth.io. Guardian benefits from a strong and active community of Elixir developers who contribute to its ongoing development and provide support through forums and documentation. On the other hand, OAuth.io boasts a larger user base and extensive documentation, making it easier to find resources and help for troubleshooting and implementation challenges.

  6. Scalability and Performance: In terms of scalability and performance, Guardian is favored for its lightweight and efficient JWT-based authentication, making it suitable for applications requiring high performance and scalability. In contrast, OAuth.io's reliance on standard OAuth protocols may introduce additional overhead, impacting the overall performance and scalability of the authentication process in certain use cases.

In Summary, Guardian and OAuth.io differ in their authentication protocols, customization levels, supported platforms, ease of implementation, community support, and scalability/performance considerations.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Guardian
Pros of OAuth.io
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 4
      SDK's
    • 3
      Integration with 100+ Providers
    • 1
      Useful screenshots
    • 1
      Add your own provider
    • 1
      Core oauthd open source
    • 1
      Extreme simplicity
    • 1
      Heroku add-on

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    What is Guardian?

    Avoid dealing with OAuth logic in your code, and spend more time creating your product. Guardian reduces the OAuth footprint in your code to a single request. Built with modularity in mind, Guardian leverages plugins to handle OAuth flows, should you encounter a flow that Guardian doesn't handle, create a small flow plugin to do so and carry on. Guardian comes with 5 pre-made plugins that cover 99% of OAuth services.

    What is OAuth.io?

    OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Guardian?
    What companies use OAuth.io?
      No companies found
      See which teams inside your own company are using Guardian or OAuth.io.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Guardian?
      What tools integrate with OAuth.io?
        No integrations found

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to Guardian and OAuth.io?
        JSON Web Token
        JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed.
        Auth0
        A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.
        Keycloak
        It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.
        Azure Active Directory
        It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution that gives you a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups. You can get the reliability and scalability you need with identity services that work with your on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environment.
        Amazon Cognito
        You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.
        See all alternatives