Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Flynn

14
48
+ 1
16
Red Hat OpenShift

1.5K
1.4K
+ 1
517
Add tool

Flynn vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Flynn and OpenShift

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Architecture**: Flynn is designed to be a platform-agnostic open-source PaaS system built on Docker containers and CoreOS, while OpenShift is a container application platform that supports Docker and Kubernetes.
2. **Configurability**: Flynn provides less configurability out-of-the-box compared to OpenShift and requires more manual setup and configuration for specific use cases.
3. **Scaling**: OpenShift offers more advanced scaling options and features compared to Flynn, allowing for more efficient utilization of resources and better performance in high-load environments.
4. **Community Support**: OpenShift has a larger and more active community of users and contributors compared to Flynn, leading to quicker updates, bug fixes, and a wider range of available resources.
5. **Enterprise Focus**: OpenShift is developed and maintained by a major enterprise software company, Red Hat, providing better support and integration with enterprise systems and services compared to Flynn.
6. **Pricing Model**: OpenShift offers both free and enterprise versions, with more advanced features and support available in the paid versions, whereas Flynn relies more on community support and does not have as many enterprise-level features in its free version.

In Summary, Flynn and OpenShift differ in terms of their architecture, configurability, scaling capabilities, community support, enterprise focus, and pricing models, making each platform suitable for different use cases and environments.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Flynn
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
  • 6
    Free
  • 5
    Supports few types of containers:libvirt-lxc, docker
  • 2
    PostgreSQL HA
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    12-factor methodology
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
  • 32
    Custom domains
  • 28
    Mongodb support
  • 27
    Clean and simple architecture
  • 25
    PHP support
  • 21
    Customizable environments
  • 11
    Ability to run CRON jobs
  • 9
    Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog
  • 8
    Easy deployment
  • 7
    PostgreSQL support
  • 7
    Autoscaling
  • 7
    Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility
  • 5
    Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear
  • 4
    Shell access to gears
  • 3
    Great Support
  • 3
    High Security
  • 3
    Logging & Metrics
  • 2
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 2
    Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure
  • 2
    No credit card needed
  • 2
    Because it is easy to manage
  • 2
    Secure
  • 2
    Meteor support
  • 2
    Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e
  • 2
    Golang support
  • 2
    Its free and offer custom domain usage
  • 1
    Autoscaling at a good price point
  • 1
    Easy setup and great customer support
  • 1
    MultiCloud
  • 1
    Great free plan with excellent support
  • 1
    This is the only free one among the three as of today

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Flynn
Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
    • 2
      License cost
    • 1
      Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Flynn?

    Flynn lets you deploy apps with git push and containers. Developers can deploy any app to any cluster in seconds.

    What is Red Hat OpenShift?

    OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Flynn?
    What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Flynn or Red Hat OpenShift.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Flynn?
    What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2602
    Node.jsnpmKubernetes+6
    1
    1411
    What are some alternatives to Flynn and Red Hat OpenShift?
    Deis
    Deis can deploy any application or service that can run inside a Docker container. In order to be scaled horizontally, applications must follow Heroku's 12-factor methodology and store state in external backing services.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Dokku
    It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    Google App Engine
    Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.
    See all alternatives