Overview

Apache Tomcat

Stacks16.8K

Followers12.6K

Votes201

GitHub Stars8.0K

Forks5.3K

Oracle Weblogic Server

Stacks150

Followers112

Votes0

Apache Tomcat vs Oracle Weblogic Server: What are the differences?

Apache Tomcat and Oracle Weblogic Server are both popular Java-based application servers used to deploy, manage, and run web applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that are worth considering.

Performance and Scalability: Apache Tomcat is known for its lightweight nature and simplicity, making it an excellent choice for small to medium-sized applications with moderate traffic. On the other hand, Oracle Weblogic Server is designed to handle large-scale enterprise applications with high traffic loads, offering advanced clustering and high-availability features that ensure reliability and scalability.
Administration and Configuration: Tomcat has a minimalistic and straightforward administration console, which makes it easier to configure and manage. It provides basic features for managing resources, such as connection pools and virtual hosts. In contrast, Weblogic Server offers a comprehensive and feature-rich administration console with advanced configuration options, providing more flexibility and control over application deployment, database integration, and security configurations.
Enterprise Support and Features: Oracle Weblogic Server is an enterprise-level application server that comes with extensive support and a wide range of enterprise features. These include support for Java EE standards, advanced security features, integration with Oracle Fusion Middleware, and comprehensive monitoring and diagnostic capabilities. Tomcat, while lacking certain enterprise-level features, is highly customizable and can be extended with various third-party libraries and frameworks.
Clustering and High Availability: Weblogic Server excels in providing advanced clustering and high-availability capabilities, making it suitable for mission-critical applications that require fault tolerance and seamless scalability. It supports distributed caching, session replication across multiple servers, and automatic failover mechanisms. Tomcat, although it supports basic load balancing and session clustering, does not offer the same level of sophistication and reliability as Weblogic Server.
Licensing and Cost: Apache Tomcat is an open-source project and is available under the Apache License, which means it is free to use and distribute. Weblogic Server, being a proprietary software product of Oracle, requires a commercial license for enterprise use. This can significantly impact the cost of ownership for organizations, especially those with smaller budgets or non-commercial applications.
Compatibility and Ecosystem: Tomcat boasts a wide compatibility with different operating systems, Java versions, and web servers. It aligns closely with the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages (JSP) specifications, making it an excellent choice for Java-based web applications. Weblogic Server, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive Java EE implementation and works seamlessly with Oracle products and technologies. It also offers a rich ecosystem of tools, frameworks, and middleware for enterprise integration and development.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a lightweight, easy-to-use, and cost-effective solution suitable for smaller applications, while Oracle Weblogic Server is a robust and feature-rich application server designed to handle large-scale enterprise applications with advanced clustering, high availability, and comprehensive administration capabilities.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

Daytona Platform As A Service

The open source development environment manager

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

6

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Oracle Weblogic Server

Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
Install apache and tomcat.
Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
Create users on RHEL for application support team.
other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat	Oracle Weblogic Server
Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.	An application server for building and deploying enterprise Java EE applications with support for new features for lowering cost of operations, improving performance, enhancing scalability and supporting the Oracle Applications portfolio.
-	Java EE full platform support;High performance clustering;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.0K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 5.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.8K	Stacks 150
Followers 12.6K	Followers 112
Votes 201	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 79 Easy 72 Java 49 Popular 1 Spring web Cons 3 Blocking - each http request block a thread 2 Easy to set up	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Oracle Weblogic Server?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.