Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Overview

Runscope

Stacks130

Followers173

Votes60

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

Paw

Stacks233

Followers277

Votes164

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope: What are the differences?

Interface: The main difference between Paw, Postman, and Runscope lies in their interface design. Paw offers a clean and intuitive interface that focuses on the request and response details. Postman, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive interface with various features like mock servers, monitoring, and automated testing. Runscope has a user-friendly interface that is geared towards monitoring and debugging API integrations.
Collaboration Features: Postman stands out in terms of collaboration features as it allows team members to work together on API development projects by sharing collections, environments, and test scripts. Paw has limited collaboration features but does offer the ability to import and export API requests. Runscope also supports team collaboration by providing shared environments and shared API testing.
Authentication Support: When it comes to authentication support, Postman is known for its wide range of options including OAuth 2.0, API key, and Basic Auth. Paw also supports various authentication methods like OAuth 1, OAuth 2, and HMAC authentication. Runscope, while offering basic authentication methods, lacks some advanced options compared to Postman and Paw.
Request Building Tools: Paw is praised for its powerful request building tools that allow users to customize headers, authentication, and parameters with ease. Postman also provides a user-friendly interface for building requests and supports features like pre-request scripts and collection runner. Runscope offers basic request building tools but lacks some advanced functionalities found in Paw and Postman.
Monitoring Capabilities: Runscope excels in monitoring capabilities with features like real-time API monitoring, performance testing, and alerts for downtime. Postman also offers monitoring features like API monitoring and uptime alerts, but it is not as robust as Runscope. Paw, on the other hand, lacks dedicated monitoring capabilities and is more focused on API testing and development.
Integration Options: Postman has an extensive set of integrations with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, Slack, and more for seamless workflow automation. Paw also provides integrations with popular tools like Jenkins and Swagger for enhancing the API development process. Runscope offers integrations with services like Slack, PagerDuty, and HipChat to facilitate team collaboration and communication.

In Summary, the key differences between Paw, Postman, and Runscope lie in their interface design, collaboration features, authentication support, request building tools, monitoring capabilities, and integration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Runscope, Postman, Paw

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

dakotamcinnis

Oct 12, 2021

Decided

OpenAPI is an excellent tool for creating interactive and hosted documents when releasing an API to the public. We will leverage this, specifically for the public facing APIs that customers can integrate into (to automate creating projects and storing experiment data). Postman is more complicated to share with others and is not as rich for documentation.

19.6k views19.6k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Runscope	Postman	Paw
Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.	It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.	Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.
Runscope Radar: Automatically monitor your APIs from around the globe. Integrates with PagerDuty, New Relic Insights, Keen IO, HipChat, Slack and more. Test complete API workflows with powerful assertions and notifications.; Runscope Metrics: API performance and usage reports.; Runscope API Traffic Inspector: Log and view API calls from any language or framework to any API to solve integration problems.	Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud	Organize your Requests, make Groups or sort by Host, Name, etc.;Easily build your requests, enjoy Formatters and Dynamic Values.;See Request and Response infos, headers, and body.;View formatted or raw HTTP Requests and Responses.;JSON Outline Viewer and Editor.;Paw supports OAuth 1 & 2, HTTP Basic Auth and Amazon S3;Paw generates ready-to-use client code
Statistics
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 130	Stacks 96.1K	Stacks 233
Followers 173	Followers 82.5K	Followers 277
Votes 60	Votes 1.8K	Votes 164
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 Great features 15 Easy to use 4 Nicely priced 4 Free plan 2 No install needed - runs on cloud	Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive	Pros 46 Great interface 37 Easy to use 25 More stable and performant than the others 16 Saves endpoints list for testing 13 Supports environment variables Cons 3 It's not free 2 MacOS Only
Integrations
Keen GitHub New Relic PagerDuty Heroku HipChat CircleCI Zapier Grove VictorOps	HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Runscope, Postman, Paw?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Read the Docs

It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar.

Related Comparisons

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope: What are the differences?

Interface: The main difference between Paw, Postman, and Runscope lies in their interface design. Paw offers a clean and intuitive interface that focuses on the request and response details. Postman, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive interface with various features like mock servers, monitoring, and automated testing. Runscope has a user-friendly interface that is geared towards monitoring and debugging API integrations.
Collaboration Features: Postman stands out in terms of collaboration features as it allows team members to work together on API development projects by sharing collections, environments, and test scripts. Paw has limited collaboration features but does offer the ability to import and export API requests. Runscope also supports team collaboration by providing shared environments and shared API testing.
Authentication Support: When it comes to authentication support, Postman is known for its wide range of options including OAuth 2.0, API key, and Basic Auth. Paw also supports various authentication methods like OAuth 1, OAuth 2, and HMAC authentication. Runscope, while offering basic authentication methods, lacks some advanced options compared to Postman and Paw.
Request Building Tools: Paw is praised for its powerful request building tools that allow users to customize headers, authentication, and parameters with ease. Postman also provides a user-friendly interface for building requests and supports features like pre-request scripts and collection runner. Runscope offers basic request building tools but lacks some advanced functionalities found in Paw and Postman.
Monitoring Capabilities: Runscope excels in monitoring capabilities with features like real-time API monitoring, performance testing, and alerts for downtime. Postman also offers monitoring features like API monitoring and uptime alerts, but it is not as robust as Runscope. Paw, on the other hand, lacks dedicated monitoring capabilities and is more focused on API testing and development.
Integration Options: Postman has an extensive set of integrations with tools like GitHub, Jenkins, Slack, and more for seamless workflow automation. Paw also provides integrations with popular tools like Jenkins and Swagger for enhancing the API development process. Runscope offers integrations with services like Slack, PagerDuty, and HipChat to facilitate team collaboration and communication.

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

Overview