Pelican vs Sphinx

Overview

Pelican

Stacks89

Followers113

Votes28

GitHub Stars13.1K

Forks1.8K

Sphinx

Stacks1.1K

Followers300

Votes32

Pelican vs Sphinx: What are the differences?

Pelican is a static site generator, while Sphinx Search is a full-text search engine. Here are the key differences between Pelican and Sphinx Search:

Primary Use and Purpose: Pelican is designed for generating static websites or blogs from plain text files, catering to individuals and small organizations aiming to create simple web content. In contrast, Sphinx Search is a specialized search engine designed to provide fast and accurate full-text search capabilities for applications and websites dealing with extensive textual content.
Functionality and Capabilities: Pelican's main functionality revolves around creating static web pages, offering simplicity and ease of use for content publishing. Sphinx Search, on the other hand, is focused on indexing and searching large amounts of textual data, providing advanced features like relevance ranking, real-time indexing, and support for complex search queries.
User Base: Pelican is commonly used by bloggers, small organizations, or individuals who need a straightforward way to publish content online. Sphinx Search caters to developers, web applications, and businesses looking to implement powerful full-text search functionality for their platforms.
Content Management vs. Information Retrieval: Pelican facilitates content management by converting content into static HTML, allowing users to publish web content efficiently. Sphinx Search is all about information retrieval, providing the ability to index vast amounts of text data and enabling users to perform fast and accurate searches across that data.
Customization and Configuration: Pelican offers customization of website appearance and layout through themes and templates, targeting users who want control over their web content's presentation. Sphinx Search focuses on search functionality customization, allowing users to fine-tune search parameters, ranking algorithms, and relevance.
Integration and Implementation: Pelican integrates with web hosting platforms and offers straightforward deployment for web content. Sphinx Search requires integration into applications and websites, requiring more extensive implementation effort to set up the search engine and tailor it to specific use cases.

In summary, Pelican is geared towards creating static websites and blogs, while Sphinx Search specializes in providing advanced full-text search capabilities for applications and websites with large textual datasets.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pelican	Sphinx
Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.	It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.
Blog articles and pages;Comments, via an external service (Disqus). (Please note that while useful, Disqus is an external service, and thus the comment data will be somewhat outside of your control and potentially subject to data loss.);Theming support (themes are created using Jinja2 templates);PDF generation of the articles/pages (optional);Publication of articles in multiple languages;Atom/RSS feeds;Code syntax highlighting;Import from WordPress, Dotclear, or RSS feeds;Integration with external tools: Twitter, Google Analytics, etc. (optional);Fast rebuild times thanks to content caching and selective output writing.	Output formats: HTML (including Windows HTML Help), LaTeX (for printable PDF versions), ePub, Texinfo, manual pages, plain text;Extensive cross-references: semantic markup and automatic links for functions, classes, citations, glossary terms and similar pieces of information;Hierarchical structure: easy definition of a document tree, with automatic links to siblings, parents and children;Automatic indices: general index as well as a language-specific module indices;Code handling: automatic highlighting using the Pygments highlighter;Extensions: automatic testing of code snippets, inclusion of docstrings from Python modules (API docs), and more
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.1K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.8K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 89	Stacks 1.1K
Followers 113	Followers 300
Votes 28	Votes 32
Pros & Cons
Pros 7 Open source 6 Jinja2 4 Implemented in Python 4 Easy to deploy 3 Plugability	Pros 16 Fast 9 Simple deployment 6 Open source 1 Lots of extentions
Integrations
Markdown	DevDocs Zapier Google Drive Google Chrome Dropbox

What are some alternatives to Pelican, Sphinx?

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

11ty

A simpler static site generator. An alternative to Jekyll. Written in JavaScript. Transforms a directory of templates (of varying types) into HTML. Works with HTML, Markdown, Liquid, Nunjucks, Handlebars, Mustache, EJS, Haml, Pug, and JavaScript Template Literals.

MkDocs

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

Related Comparisons

Primary Use and Purpose: Pelican is designed for generating static websites or blogs from plain text files, catering to individuals and small organizations aiming to create simple web content. In contrast, Sphinx Search is a specialized search engine designed to provide fast and accurate full-text search capabilities for applications and websites dealing with extensive textual content.
Functionality and Capabilities: Pelican's main functionality revolves around creating static web pages, offering simplicity and ease of use for content publishing. Sphinx Search, on the other hand, is focused on indexing and searching large amounts of textual data, providing advanced features like relevance ranking, real-time indexing, and support for complex search queries.
User Base: Pelican is commonly used by bloggers, small organizations, or individuals who need a straightforward way to publish content online. Sphinx Search caters to developers, web applications, and businesses looking to implement powerful full-text search functionality for their platforms.
Content Management vs. Information Retrieval: Pelican facilitates content management by converting content into static HTML, allowing users to publish web content efficiently. Sphinx Search is all about information retrieval, providing the ability to index vast amounts of text data and enabling users to perform fast and accurate searches across that data.
Customization and Configuration: Pelican offers customization of website appearance and layout through themes and templates, targeting users who want control over their web content's presentation. Sphinx Search focuses on search functionality customization, allowing users to fine-tune search parameters, ranking algorithms, and relevance.
Integration and Implementation: Pelican integrates with web hosting platforms and offers straightforward deployment for web content. Sphinx Search requires integration into applications and websites, requiring more extensive implementation effort to set up the search engine and tailor it to specific use cases.

Pelican vs Sphinx