StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Phabricator vs RhodeCode

Phabricator vs RhodeCode

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187
RhodeCode
RhodeCode
Stacks33
Followers42
Votes210

Phabricator vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?

<Phabricator and RhodeCode are both popular tools for managing software development projects. Phabricator is an open-source platform that offers a suite of tools for code review, repository hosting, and task management. On the other hand, RhodeCode is a commercial platform that provides similar features but focuses more on enterprise-grade security and scalability. Below are the key differences between Phabricator and RhodeCode.>

  1. Licensing Model: Phabricator is open-source software released under the Apache License 2.0, allowing users to modify and distribute the code freely. RhodeCode, on the other hand, is a commercial platform that requires a paid license for enterprise-level features and support. This difference in licensing models can influence the choice of software based on the organization's budget and requirements.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Phabricator is known for its flexibility and customizability, making it suitable for smaller teams and projects. RhodeCode, on the other hand, is designed to handle large-scale enterprise operations with high performance and scalability features. Organizations with growing teams and complex projects may find RhodeCode more suitable for their needs.

  3. Security Features: RhodeCode puts a strong emphasis on security, offering advanced access control mechanisms, audit trails, and encryption capabilities to protect sensitive code and data. Phabricator also provides security features but may require additional configurations or plugins to achieve the same level of protection as RhodeCode. Organizations with strict security requirements may prefer RhodeCode for its robust security measures.

  4. User Interface and User Experience: Phabricator has a more minimalist and technical user interface, which may appeal to developers and technical users who prefer functionality over design aesthetics. RhodeCode, on the other hand, offers a more polished and user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation and visual elements, making it easier for non-technical users to adopt and use the platform effectively.

  5. Integration and Extensibility: Phabricator provides a wide range of integrations with other development tools and services through its APIs and extensions, offering flexibility for customization and integration into existing workflows. RhodeCode also supports integrations with popular tools but may have a more limited selection compared to Phabricator. Organizations with specific integration requirements may need to evaluate the available options in each platform.

In Summary, Phabricator and RhodeCode differ in their licensing models, scalability, security features, user interface, and integration capabilities, catering to different needs and preferences within the software development community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phabricator
Phabricator
RhodeCode
RhodeCode

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
unified repository management across Mercurial, Git & SVN;full­-text source code search;web-­based code editor;built­-in code review tools;permission management system with IP restrictions;code snippets system (gists);authentication with LDAP, ActiveDirectory, BitBucket, Google & GitHub; integrations with Jira, RedMine, Jenkins
Statistics
Stacks
221
Stacks
33
Followers
323
Followers
42
Votes
187
Votes
210
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Pros
  • 22
    Self hosted
  • 20
    Great performance
  • 19
    Integrations with CI / issue trackers
  • 19
    Multiple version control systems
  • 18
    Open Source
Cons
  • 0
    No easy installation for Windows
Integrations
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Jira
Jira
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Redmine
Redmine
TeamCity
TeamCity
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Phabricator, RhodeCode?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana