Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Phabricator vs RhodeCode: What are the differences?
Licensing Model: Phabricator is open-source software released under the Apache License 2.0, allowing users to modify and distribute the code freely. RhodeCode, on the other hand, is a commercial platform that requires a paid license for enterprise-level features and support. This difference in licensing models can influence the choice of software based on the organization's budget and requirements.
Scalability and Performance: Phabricator is known for its flexibility and customizability, making it suitable for smaller teams and projects. RhodeCode, on the other hand, is designed to handle large-scale enterprise operations with high performance and scalability features. Organizations with growing teams and complex projects may find RhodeCode more suitable for their needs.
Security Features: RhodeCode puts a strong emphasis on security, offering advanced access control mechanisms, audit trails, and encryption capabilities to protect sensitive code and data. Phabricator also provides security features but may require additional configurations or plugins to achieve the same level of protection as RhodeCode. Organizations with strict security requirements may prefer RhodeCode for its robust security measures.
User Interface and User Experience: Phabricator has a more minimalist and technical user interface, which may appeal to developers and technical users who prefer functionality over design aesthetics. RhodeCode, on the other hand, offers a more polished and user-friendly interface with intuitive navigation and visual elements, making it easier for non-technical users to adopt and use the platform effectively.
Integration and Extensibility: Phabricator provides a wide range of integrations with other development tools and services through its APIs and extensions, offering flexibility for customization and integration into existing workflows. RhodeCode also supports integrations with popular tools but may have a more limited selection compared to Phabricator. Organizations with specific integration requirements may need to evaluate the available options in each platform.
In Summary, Phabricator and RhodeCode differ in their licensing models, scalability, security features, user interface, and integration capabilities, catering to different needs and preferences within the software development community.
Pros of Phabricator
- Open Source33
- Code Review29
- Supports Git/Hg/SVN25
- Bug Tracking18
- Audit Source Code17
- Unlimited Repo Support11
- Software Engineering Platform10
- Super fast task creation10
- Flexible Project Management9
- Project Management8
- Self hosted5
- Building Better Software4
- Best Integration with Gitlab2
- Complete set for collaborating on software development2
- Powerful, Complete, Fast, Reliable and Open Source1
- Straightforward code review process1
- Workflow1
- Very effective system, does all PM & code org needed1
Pros of RhodeCode
- Self hosted22
- Great performance20
- Multiple version control systems19
- Integrations with CI / issue trackers19
- Full text search18
- Open Source18
- Best in class permission18
- Secure authentication17
- Permission system15
- One line online/offiline upgrades11
- Easy installation7
- Supports multiple version control systems6
- Advanced code reviews6
- Free, unlimited users6
- free up to 25users3
- Runs under Windows, too3
- SVN support1
- Features and great support1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Phabricator
Cons of RhodeCode
- No easy installation for Windows0