Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Nightwatchjs vs PhantomJS: What are the differences?
1. Browser Automation: The key difference between Nightwatchjs and PhantomJS is that Nightwatchjs is specifically designed for browser automation testing, while PhantomJS is a headless browser which can be used for various automation tasks including testing. 2. API Support: Nightwatchjs provides a simple and easy-to-use API for writing and executing automated tests, while PhantomJS requires knowledge of JavaScript to create automation scripts. 3. Community Support: Nightwatchjs has a larger and active community that regularly contributes to its development and updates, whereas PhantomJS has seen a decline in community support and updates in recent years. 4. Performance: Nightwatchjs is known for its faster test execution speed and better performance compared to PhantomJS, which can be slower in certain scenarios. 5. Cross-Browser Testing: Nightwatchjs supports cross-browser testing out of the box, allowing testers to run the same tests on different browsers, whereas PhantomJS is limited to testing in a headless browser environment. 6. Ease of Use: Nightwatchjs provides a more user-friendly and intuitive interface for creating and running tests, making it easier for testers to write and maintain automation scripts compared to PhantomJS.
In Summary, Nightwatchjs excels in browser automation testing with its user-friendly interface, cross-browser support, and faster performance, while PhantomJS, being a headless browser, may be more suitable for specific automation tasks requiring a headless environment.
I am using Node 12 for server scripting and have a function to generate PDF and send it to a browser. Currently, we are using PhantomJS to generate a PDF. Some web post shows that we can achieve PDF generation using Puppeteer. I was a bit confused. Should we move to puppeteerJS? Which one is better with NodeJS for generating PDF?
You better go with puppeteer. It is basically chrome automation tool, written in nodejs. So what you get is PDF, generated by chrome itself. I guess there is hardly better PDF generation tool for the web. Phantomjs is already more or less outdated as technology. It uses some old webkit port that's quite behind in terms of standards and features. It can be replaced with puppeteer for every single task.
I suggest puppeteer to go for. It is simple and easy to set up. Only limitaiton is it can be used only for chrome browser and currently they are looking into expanding into FF. The next thing is Playwright which is just a scale up of Puppeteer. It supports cross browsers.
Pros of Nightwatchjs
- Open source3
- Testing2
- Automates browsers2
- Better cross browser (use selenium)1
- Cross-Browser Testing1
- Multiple Browser Support1
- Parallel Test Running1
Pros of PhantomJS
- Scriptable web browser13
- Depends on QT3
- No ECMAScript 62
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Nightwatchjs
- No automatic wait2
- Less flexibility1
- Limited native mobile app support1
- Limited browser support1
- Configuration complexity1
Cons of PhantomJS
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Nightwatchjs?
What is PhantomJS?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Nightwatchjs?
What companies use PhantomJS?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Nightwatchjs?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+37