Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Galileo vs Postman: What are the differences?
# Introduction
Galileo and Postman are two popular tools used for API testing and development. While they both serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that cater to different needs and preferences.
## 1. Flexibility in API development:
Galileo allows users to create custom API simulators and virtual services for complex test scenarios, providing a high level of flexibility in API development. On the other hand, Postman focuses more on API testing and collaboration, offering a user-friendly interface for simplifying API testing processes.
## 2. Collaboration features:
Postman offers extensive collaboration features, such as team workspaces, seamless sharing of collections and environments, and built-in version control, making it ideal for teamwork and sharing API testing resources. In contrast, Galileo may lack advanced collaboration capabilities, focusing more on individual API development needs.
## 3. Advanced testing capabilities:
Galileo offers advanced testing capabilities, such as automated load testing, performance monitoring, and complex response validation, catering to users with more extensive testing requirements. Postman, while comprehensive in its testing features, may not offer the same level of advanced testing capabilities as Galileo.
## 4. Pricing model:
Galileo typically offers a more flexible pricing model, allowing users to choose from various subscription plans based on their specific needs and budget constraints. Postman, although providing a free version for individual users, might have limitations or require paid subscriptions for accessing certain advanced features or increased testing capacities.
## 5. User Interface:
Postman is known for its user-friendly interface, making it easy for users to create and execute API requests, organize test cases, and analyze data efficiently. Galileo, while functional and feature-rich, may have a steeper learning curve due to its more complex interface and advanced capabilities.
## 6. Ecosystem integrations:
Postman offers a wide range of integrations with various tools and services in the API development ecosystem, ensuring seamless workflows and expanded functionality. Galileo, while compatible with popular tools, may have fewer integrations available, limiting its potential for ecosystem connectivity and interoperability.
In Summary, Galileo and Postman differ in terms of flexibility, collaboration features, testing capabilities, pricing models, user interface, and ecosystem integrations, catering to diverse needs in the API development and testing landscape.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Galileo
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Galileo
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1