Container Factory vs Powerstrip

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Container Factory

0
8
+ 1
0
Powerstrip

0
2
+ 1
1
Add tool

Container Factory vs Powerstrip: What are the differences?

Developers describe Container Factory as "Turn your Github repo into a published container image". container-factory produces Docker images from tarballs of application source code. It accepts archives with Dockerfiles, but if your application's language is supported, it can automatically add a suitable Dockerfile. On the other hand, Powerstrip is detailed as "A tool for prototyping Docker extensions". Powerstrip is implemented as a configurable, pluggable HTTP proxy for the Docker API which lets you plug multiple Docker extension prototypes into the same Docker daemon. For example, you can have a storage adapter (e.g. Flocker) running alongside a networking adapter (e.g. Weave), all playing nice with your choice of orchestration framework.

Container Factory and Powerstrip can be categorized as "Container" tools.

Container Factory and Powerstrip are both open source tools. It seems that Powerstrip with 309 GitHub stars and 31 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Container Factory with 56 GitHub stars and 2 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Container Factory
Pros of Powerstrip
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 1
      It's multiple docker contain many files and more option

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Container Factory?

    container-factory produces Docker images from tarballs of application source code. It accepts archives with Dockerfiles, but if your application's language is supported, it can automatically add a suitable Dockerfile.

    What is Powerstrip?

    Powerstrip is implemented as a configurable, pluggable HTTP proxy for the Docker API which lets you plug multiple Docker extension prototypes into the same Docker daemon. For example, you can have a storage adapter (e.g. Flocker) running alongside a networking adapter (e.g. Weave), all playing nice with your choice of orchestration framework.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What tools integrate with Container Factory?
    What tools integrate with Powerstrip?
    What are some alternatives to Container Factory and Powerstrip?
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    Docker Compose
    With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.
    Rancher
    Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.
    Docker Swarm
    Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
    Argo
    Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).
    See all alternatives