Puma vs WebFaction: What are the differences?
What is Puma? A Modern, Concurrent Web Server for Ruby. Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.
What is WebFaction? Hosting for developers: full shell access to fast servers with all your favorite tools pre-installed and maintained for you. No need to spend hours installing and configuring the software, database and other tools. We have over 50 one-click installers in our control panel.
Puma belongs to "Web Servers" category of the tech stack, while WebFaction can be primarily classified under "Cloud Hosting".
"Easy" is the top reason why over 2 developers like Puma, while over 2 developers mention "Cost effective" as the leading cause for choosing WebFaction.
Puma is an open source tool with 5.79K GitHub stars and 989 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Puma's open source repository on GitHub.
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Puma?
What is WebFaction?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions