StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Javascript Testing Framework
  5. QUnit vs Selenium

QUnit vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

QUnit
QUnit
Stacks914
Followers82
Votes17
Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K

QUnit vs Selenium: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between QUnit and Selenium to help users understand the distinctions between these popular testing tools.

1. **Language Support**: QUnit is mainly used for testing JavaScript code, whereas Selenium is more versatile and supports various programming languages such as Java, Python, Ruby, and C#.
2. **Testing Scope**: QUnit is designed for unit testing, focusing on isolated components or functions, whereas Selenium is used for end-to-end testing, examining the functionality of an entire application or system.
3. **Browser Interaction**: QUnit runs tests directly in the browser using HTML pages, while Selenium interacts with browsers remotely using WebDriver APIs, providing better compatibility across different browsers.
4. **Test Automation**: Selenium is primarily used for automating web application testing by simulating user interactions, such as clicking buttons and entering text, whereas QUnit is more suitable for conducting automated unit tests for JavaScript code.
5. **Parallel Test Execution**: Selenium allows running tests in parallel across multiple browsers and environments simultaneously, ensuring efficient testing processes, while QUnit does not natively support parallel test execution.
6. **Integration and Compatibility**: Selenium can be seamlessly integrated with various Continuous Integration tools like Jenkins, whereas QUnit may require additional configurations for automation in the CI/CD pipeline.

In Summary, the key differences between QUnit and Selenium lie in their language support, testing scope, browser interaction, test automation capabilities, parallel test execution, and integration with CI tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on QUnit, Selenium

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

QUnit
QUnit
Selenium
Selenium

QUnit is a powerful, easy-to-use JavaScript unit testing framework. It's used by the jQuery, jQuery UI and jQuery Mobile projects and is capable of testing any generic JavaScript code, including itself!

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
Stacks
914
Stacks
16.2K
Followers
82
Followers
12.6K
Votes
17
Votes
527
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Simple
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Promise support
  • 1
    Excellent GUI
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

What are some alternatives to QUnit, Selenium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana