Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

RabbitMQ

17K
14.9K
+ 1
521
VerneMQ

29
121
+ 1
6
Add tool

RabbitMQ vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

Developers describe RabbitMQ as "A messaging broker - an intermediary for messaging". RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received. On the other hand, VerneMQ is detailed as "VerneMQ is a distributed IoT/MQTT message broker". VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications..

RabbitMQ and VerneMQ can be categorized as "Message Queue" tools.

Some of the features offered by RabbitMQ are:

  • Robust messaging for applications
  • Easy to use
  • Runs on all major operating systems

On the other hand, VerneMQ provides the following key features:

  • Open Source, Apache 2 licensed
  • QoS 0, QoS 1, QoS 2
  • MQTT v5.0 fully implemented

RabbitMQ and VerneMQ are both open source tools. RabbitMQ with 5.95K GitHub stars and 1.78K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than VerneMQ with 1.76K GitHub stars and 189 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of RabbitMQ
Pros of VerneMQ
  • 232
    It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring
  • 79
    Ease of configuration
  • 58
    I like the admin interface
  • 50
    Easy to set-up and start with
  • 20
    Durable
  • 18
    Intuitive work through python
  • 18
    Standard protocols
  • 10
    Written primarily in Erlang
  • 8
    Simply superb
  • 6
    Completeness of messaging patterns
  • 3
    Scales to 1 million messages per second
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 2
    Better than most traditional queue based message broker
  • 2
    Distributed
  • 2
    Supports AMQP
  • 1
    Inubit Integration
  • 1
    Delayed messages
  • 1
    Supports MQTT
  • 1
    Runs on Open Telecom Platform
  • 1
    High performance
  • 1
    Reliability
  • 1
    Clusterable
  • 1
    Clear documentation with different scripting language
  • 1
    Great ui
  • 1
    Better routing system
  • 1
    Fully open source clustering
  • 1
    Proxy Protocol support
  • 1
    Open Source Plugin System
  • 1
    Open Source Message and Metadata Persistence
  • 1
    MQTT v5 implementation
  • 1
    Open source shared subscriptions

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of RabbitMQ
Cons of VerneMQ
  • 9
    Too complicated cluster/HA config and management
  • 6
    Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime
  • 5
    Configuration must be done first, not by your code
  • 4
    Slow
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is RabbitMQ?

    RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

    What is VerneMQ?

    VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP. It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use RabbitMQ?
    What companies use VerneMQ?
    See which teams inside your own company are using RabbitMQ or VerneMQ.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with RabbitMQ?
    What tools integrate with VerneMQ?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubPythonNode.js+47
    53
    70446
    GitHubGitDocker+34
    29
    41507
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    52
    20383
    GitHubPythonSlack+25
    7
    2951
    GitHubPythonDocker+24
    13
    16815
    GitHubMySQLSlack+44
    109
    50315
    What are some alternatives to RabbitMQ and VerneMQ?
    Kafka
    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
    ActiveMQ
    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
    ZeroMQ
    The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.
    Amazon SNS
    Amazon Simple Notification Service makes it simple and cost-effective to push to mobile devices such as iPhone, iPad, Android, Kindle Fire, and internet connected smart devices, as well as pushing to other distributed services. Besides pushing cloud notifications directly to mobile devices, SNS can also deliver notifications by SMS text message or email, to Simple Queue Service (SQS) queues, or to any HTTP endpoint.
    Redis
    Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.
    See all alternatives