Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Red Hat OpenShift

1.5K
1.4K
+ 1
517
Render

239
218
+ 1
147
Add tool

OpenShift vs Render.com: What are the differences?

Developers describe OpenShift as "Red Hat's free Platform as a Service (PaaS) for hosting Java, PHP, Ruby, Python, Node.js, and Perl apps". OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications. On the other hand, Render.com is detailed as "A unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites". It is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

OpenShift and Render.com belong to "Platform as a Service" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by OpenShift are:

  • Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise)
  • OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift.
  • OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play

On the other hand, Render.com provides the following key features:

  • Instant and continuous deploys from GitHub and GitLab
  • Global CDN
  • Fully managed PostgreSQL

OpenShift is an open source tool with 914 GitHub stars and 559 GitHub forks. Here's a link to OpenShift's open source repository on GitHub.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Red Hat OpenShift
Pros of Render
  • 99
    Good free plan
  • 63
    Open Source
  • 47
    Easy setup
  • 43
    Nodejs support
  • 42
    Well documented
  • 32
    Custom domains
  • 28
    Mongodb support
  • 27
    Clean and simple architecture
  • 25
    PHP support
  • 21
    Customizable environments
  • 11
    Ability to run CRON jobs
  • 9
    Easier than Heroku for a WordPress blog
  • 8
    Easy deployment
  • 7
    PostgreSQL support
  • 7
    Autoscaling
  • 7
    Good balance between Heroku and AWS for flexibility
  • 5
    Free, Easy Setup, Lot of Gear or D.I.Y Gear
  • 4
    Shell access to gears
  • 3
    Great Support
  • 3
    High Security
  • 3
    Logging & Metrics
  • 2
    Cloud Agnostic
  • 2
    Runs Anywhere - AWS, GCP, Azure
  • 2
    No credit card needed
  • 2
    Because it is easy to manage
  • 2
    Secure
  • 2
    Meteor support
  • 2
    Overly complicated and over engineered in majority of e
  • 2
    Golang support
  • 2
    Its free and offer custom domain usage
  • 1
    Autoscaling at a good price point
  • 1
    Easy setup and great customer support
  • 1
    MultiCloud
  • 1
    Great free plan with excellent support
  • 1
    This is the only free one among the three as of today
  • 22
    Very easy to start
  • 17
    Zero Downtime Deploys
  • 17
    Infrastructure as Code
  • 16
    Pull Request Previews
  • 16
    Easy deployment
  • 14
    Custom domains support
  • 12
    Zero devops skills required
  • 12
    Free and automatic SSL
  • 11
    Tech oriented support
  • 10
    100GB free for static site

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Red Hat OpenShift
Cons of Render
  • 2
    Decisions are made for you, limiting your options
  • 2
    License cost
  • 1
    Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Red Hat OpenShift?

    OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

    What is Render?

    Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Red Hat OpenShift?
    What companies use Render?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Red Hat OpenShift or Render.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Red Hat OpenShift?
    What tools integrate with Render?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2605
    Node.jsnpmKubernetes+6
    1
    1415
    What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift and Render?
    Cloud Foundry
    Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.
    OpenStack
    OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.
    Docker
    The Docker Platform is the industry-leading container platform for continuous, high-velocity innovation, enabling organizations to seamlessly build and share any application — from legacy to what comes next — and securely run them anywhere
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    See all alternatives