StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Mobile Database
  5. Redux Offline vs Redux Persist

Redux Offline vs Redux Persist

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redux Persist
Redux Persist
Stacks268
Followers111
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.0K
Forks860
Redux Offline
Redux Offline
Stacks26
Followers74
Votes0

Redux Offline vs Redux Persist: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will be discussing the key differences between Redux Offline and Redux Persist, two popular libraries in the Redux ecosystem.

  1. Embedded Offline Capabilities: Redux Offline focuses on providing seamless offline data handling in Redux applications by offering a built-in approach for managing offline actions. It allows for automatic queuing and replaying of offline actions when the network connection is restored. On the other hand, Redux Persist primarily focuses on persisting the Redux store to local storage or any other storage engine, ensuring that the state remains intact even after a page reload or app restart.

  2. Network Reconciliation: While both libraries handle the persistence of data, they approach network reconciliation differently. Redux Offline enables users to define custom network reconciliation logic, allowing for more fine-grained control over how offline actions are synchronized with the server. Redux Persist, on the other hand, doesn't offer built-in network reconciliation functionality and mainly relies on the data stored in the local storage.

  3. Middleware Integration: Redux Offline provides a middleware that needs to be added to the Redux store, which seamlessly intercepts and processes offline actions. The middleware manages the queuing, replaying, and synchronization of offline actions. In contrast, Redux Persist provides a store enhancer that allows for seamless integration with the Redux store. The store enhancer enables automatic state rehydration and persistance.

  4. Size and Complexity: Redux Offline tends to be more lightweight and less complex compared to Redux Persist. It focuses solely on providing offline capabilities, making it suitable for applications with a strong offline requirement. Redux Persist, on the other hand, provides a broader set of features related to state persistance, making it more suitable for applications that require long-term storage of data.

  5. Version Compatibility: Redux Offline is compatible with Redux version 3.x and above, providing support for older Redux versions. Redux Persist, on the other hand, requires Redux version 3.5.0 or above to function properly. It is important to consider the compatibility of these libraries with your current Redux version when choosing between the two.

  6. Configuration and Customization: Redux Offline offers a more flexible and customizable approach to configuration. It allows users to define custom rehydration, persist, and detection options according to their specific requirements. Redux Persist, on the other hand, provides a more straightforward configuration process with fewer customization options. However, it offers a more seamless integration with existing Redux stores and requires less manual configuration.

In summary, Redux Offline and Redux Persist differ in their focus (offline capabilities vs. state persistence), network reconciliation approach, middleware integration, size and complexity, version compatibility, and configuration/customization options. These differences should be considered when choosing the appropriate library for your Redux application.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Redux Persist
Redux Persist
Redux Offline
Redux Offline

It is a library allowing to save the redux store in the local storage of your browser. It promises to retain the users’ redux-state which is an attractive proposition for most developers.

Persistent Redux store for Reasonaboutable™️ Offline-First applications, with first-class support for optimistic UI. Use with React, React Native, or as standalone state container for any web app.

ships with react integration; State Reconciler;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
860
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
268
Stacks
26
Followers
111
Followers
74
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Redux
Redux
React Native
React Native
Realm
Realm
Redux
Redux
React
React

What are some alternatives to Redux Persist, Redux Offline?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase