Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
miso vs Semantic UI: What are the differences?
miso: ๐ A tasty Haskell front-end framework. Miso is a small "isomorphic" Haskell front-end framework featuring a virtual-dom, diffing / patching algorithm, event delegation, event batching, SVG, Server-sent events, Websockets, and an extensible Subscription-based subsystem; Semantic UI: A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language. Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.
miso and Semantic UI can be categorized as "Front-End Frameworks" tools.
miso and Semantic UI are both open source tools. Semantic UI with 45.9K GitHub stars and 4.84K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than miso with 1.33K GitHub stars and 95 GitHub forks.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of miso
Pros of Semantic UI
Pros of miso
Be the first to leave a pro
Pros of Semantic UI
- Easy to use and looks elegant157
- Variety of components92
- Themes64
- Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use61
- Semantic, duh57
- Its the future44
- Open source42
- Very active development37
- Far less complicated structure31
- Gulp28
- Already has more features than bootstrap9
- Just compare it to Bootstrap and you'll be hooked8
- Clean and consistent markup model7
- UI components7
- Responsiveness6
- Because it is semantic :-D4
- Elegant. clean. readable. maintainable4
- Good-Looking4
- Is big and look really great, nothing like this2
- Consistent2
- Great docs2
- Modular and scalable2
- Easy to use1
- Blends with reactjs1
- Jquery1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of miso
Cons of Semantic UI
Cons of miso
Be the first to leave a con
Cons of Semantic UI
- Outdated build tool (gulp 3))5
- Poor accessibility support3
- HTML is not semantic (see list component)3
- Javascript is tied to jquery2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is miso?
Miso is a small "isomorphic" Haskell front-end framework featuring a virtual-dom, diffing / patching algorithm, event delegation, event batching, SVG, Server-sent events, Websockets, and an extensible Subscription-based subsystem.
What is Semantic UI?
Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use miso?
What companies use Semantic UI?
What companies use miso?
No companies found
See which teams inside your own company are using miso or Semantic UI.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with miso?
What tools integrate with Semantic UI?
What tools integrate with miso?
What tools integrate with Semantic UI?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to miso and Semantic UI?
Red
It is both an imperative and functional programming language. Its syntax and general usage overlaps that of the interpreted Rebol language.
Bootstrap
Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.
Material Design for Angular
Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.
Animate.css
It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.
Tailwind CSS
Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.