Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Chef vs SlickStack: What are the differences?
Developers describe Chef as "Build, destroy and rebuild servers on any public or private cloud". Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others. On the other hand, SlickStack is detailed as "LEMP stack automation for WordPress". SlickStack is a free LEMP stack automation script written in Bash designed to enhance and simplify WordPress provisioning, performance, and security.
Chef and SlickStack belong to "Server Configuration and Automation" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Chef are:
- Access to 800+ Reusable Cookbooks
- Integration with Leading Cloud Providers
- Enterprise Platform Support including Windows and Solaris
On the other hand, SlickStack provides the following key features:
- CloudFlare
- Ubuntu
- Nginx
Chef and SlickStack are both open source tools. Chef with 5.86K GitHub stars and 2.36K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than SlickStack with 88 GitHub stars and 20 GitHub forks.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Chef
- Dynamic and idempotent server configuration110
- Reusable components76
- Integration testing with Vagrant47
- Repeatable43
- Mock testing with Chefspec30
- Ruby14
- Can package cookbooks to guarantee repeatability8
- Works with AWS7
- Has marketplace where you get readymade cookbooks3
- Matured product with good community support3
- Less declarative more procedural2
- Open source configuration mgmt made easy(ish)2
Pros of SlickStack
- WordPress exclusive0
- Designed for Ubuntu LTS0
- Dependency-free0
- Idempotent installation0
- Works on any cloud VPS network0
- Free OpenSSL certificates (that never expire)0
- 100% open source (better security and transparency)0
- Native Bash commands (no learning new shortcuts)0
- Includes MU plugins for technical SEO, etc0
- Built-in WordPress plugin blacklist0
- Redis object caching enabled by default0
- Nginx FastCGI Cache enabled by default0