StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Snowflake vs Yellowbrick

Snowflake vs Yellowbrick

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Snowflake
Snowflake
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes27
Yellowbrick
Yellowbrick
Stacks6
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks566

Snowflake vs Yellowbrick: What are the differences?

Introduction: Snowflake and Yellowbrick are two distinct technologies used for different purposes. Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehouse solution, while Yellowbrick is an analytics platform for data analysis and visualization.

  1. Architecture: Snowflake uses a multi-cluster shared data architecture that allows concurrent access to the same data. It separates compute and storage, enabling independent scaling of both resources based on workload requirements. On the other hand, Yellowbrick follows a distributed architecture, leveraging the power of multiple commodity servers for data processing and analytics.

  2. Scalability: Snowflake offers near-infinite scalability, allowing users to seamlessly scale their computing resources up or down as needed. This flexible scaling capability ensures optimal performance and cost-efficiency. In contrast, Yellowbrick also provides scalable processing with its distributed architecture but may have constraints compared to Snowflake due to hardware limitations.

  3. Data Storage: Snowflake provides a shared, centralized data storage repository, where data is stored in its proprietary file format. This allows for efficient storage and optimized data retrieval. In contrast, Yellowbrick does not have a storage system of its own. It relies on integrating with existing storage solutions such as Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) or network-attached storage (NAS) for data storage.

  4. SQL Support: Snowflake is built on SQL, and it supports ANSI SQL, allowing users to write standard SQL queries with ease. It also provides built-in support for semi-structured data like JSON and XML. Yellowbrick also supports ANSI SQL, providing users with a familiar querying language. However, Yellowbrick's analytics platform offers more advanced and interactive visualization capabilities compared to Snowflake.

  5. Integration: Snowflake integrates well with various tools and platforms, allowing seamless data ingestion, transformation, and analysis. It provides connectors for popular business intelligence (BI) tools and data integration platforms. Conversely, Yellowbrick also supports integration with different BI tools but is primarily focused on its own advanced analytics platform.

  6. Security and Governance: Snowflake has robust security features, including multi-factor authentication, encryption at rest and in transit, and access control mechanisms. It also provides granular control over data access and governance. Similarly, Yellowbrick prioritizes security and offers features like user authentication and authorization, encryption, and auditing capabilities to ensure data protection and governance.

In summary, Snowflake and Yellowbrick differ in architecture, scalability, data storage, SQL support, integration capabilities, and security and governance features, catering to specific use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Snowflake
Snowflake
Yellowbrick
Yellowbrick

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

It is a suite of visual diagnostic tools called "Visualizers" that extend the scikit-learn API to allow human steering of the model selection process. In a nutshell, it combines scikit-learn with matplotlib in the best tradition of the scikit-learn documentation, but to produce visualizations for your machine learning workflow.

-
Evaluate the stability and predictive value of machine learning models and improve the speed of the experimental workflow; Provide visual tools for monitoring model performance in real-world applications; Provide visual interpretation of the behavior of the model in high dimensional feature space.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
566
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
6
Followers
1.2K
Followers
12
Votes
27
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Public and Private Data Sharing
  • 4
    User Friendly
  • 4
    Multicloud
  • 4
    Good Performance
  • 3
    Great Documentation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Node.js
Node.js
Looker
Looker
Periscope
Periscope
Mode
Mode
Matplotlib
Matplotlib
scikit-learn
scikit-learn

What are some alternatives to Snowflake, Yellowbrick?

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase