Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Snyk vs SonarLint: What are the differences?
- Integration: Snyk primarily focuses on identifying and fixing vulnerabilities in open-source libraries and container images, providing seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines for automated security testing. On the other hand, SonarLint is more oriented towards identifying and fixing code quality issues during development within the IDE.
- Scope of Analysis: Snyk primarily deals with security vulnerabilities in third-party dependencies, providing actionable insights into known vulnerabilities and license issues. SonarLint, on the other hand, is more focused on identifying code quality and maintainability issues such as code smells, bugs, and code duplication.
- Language Support: Snyk supports a wide range of programming languages like JavaScript, Python, Java, and others, making it suitable for projects using diverse technologies. In contrast, SonarLint provides more in-depth analysis and support for specific languages like Java, C#, and JavaScript, offering advanced code quality checks tailored to those languages.
- Automation: Snyk's vulnerability testing and scanning processes can be automated within the development workflow, enabling continuous monitoring and remediation of security issues. SonarLint offers real-time code analysis within the IDE, providing developers with instant feedback on code quality and suggesting improvements as they write code.
- Reporting and Remediation: Snyk offers detailed reports on vulnerabilities found in open-source dependencies, along with recommendations for remediation and security best practices. SonarLint provides actionable insights and suggestions for fixing code quality issues directly within the IDE, helping developers improve the overall quality of their codebase.
- Cost: Snyk offers both free and paid plans with varying levels of features and capabilities, making it accessible to individual developers and teams of all sizes. SonarLint, on the other hand, is primarily meant for individual developers and small teams and does not have complex pricing structures or enterprise-level offerings.
In Summary, Snyk and SonarLint differ in their focus on security vulnerabilities vs. code quality, integration capabilities, language support, automation, reporting, and cost structures.
I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.
I'd recommend Snyk since it provides an IDE extension for Developers, SAST, auto PR security fixes, container, IaC and includes open source scanning as well. I like their scoring method as well for better prioritization. I was able to remove most of the containers and cli tools I had in my pipelines since Snyk covers secrets, vulns, security and some code cleaning. SAST has false positives but the scoring helps. Also had to spend time putting some training docs but their engineers helped out with content.
Pros of Snyk
- Github Integration10
- Free for open source projects5
- Finds lots of real vulnerabilities4
- Easy to deployed1
Pros of SonarLint
- IDE Integration13
- Free3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Snyk
- Does not integrated with SonarQube2
- No malware detection1
- No surface monitoring1
- Complex UI1
- False positives1
Cons of SonarLint
- Non contextual warnings3
- Not Very User Friendly3