Snyk vs WhiteSource

Overview

Snyk

Stacks580

Followers380

Votes20

WhiteSource

Stacks25

Followers67

Votes0

Snyk vs WhiteSource: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of software development, it is crucial to prioritize and manage security vulnerabilities efficiently. Snyk and WhiteSource are two prominent tools that provide security solutions to deal with vulnerabilities in software applications. Both tools offer unique features, but they also have key differences. In this analysis, we will outline the main differences between Snyk and WhiteSource.

1. Integration Capability: Snyk excels in its ability to integrate seamlessly into various development workflows, including Git, GitHub, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, and more. It offers robust integrations with popular code repositories and continuous integration tools, enabling developers to easily access and fix vulnerabilities within their development environment. On the other hand, while WhiteSource also provides integrations with repositories and CI/CD tools like Jira and Jenkins, its integration options are relatively more limited compared to Snyk.

2. Support for Programming Languages: Both Snyk and WhiteSource support a wide range of programming languages commonly used in software development, such as Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, etc. However, Snyk offers a more extensive language support and has additional features specifically designed for specific ecosystems like Node.js and containerized applications. This comprehensive language coverage gives Snyk an edge when it comes to diverse software development projects.

3. Remediation Recommendations: Snyk stands out with its robust remediation advice and actionable recommendations to fix vulnerabilities. It provides clear and specific guidance on how to address each vulnerability, including code changes or library updates. Snyk also offers patches and automatically suggests fixes to make the vulnerability resolution process more efficient. Although WhiteSource also offers remediation information, its level of granularity and actionable recommendations are not as comprehensive as Snyk.

4. Continuous Monitoring and Real-time Alerts: Snyk offers continuous monitoring capabilities, allowing developers to be alerted in real-time whenever new vulnerabilities are discovered in their codebase or dependencies. It can proactively detect and notify developers about newly disclosed vulnerabilities, ensuring that the project remains up-to-date with the latest security patches. While WhiteSource does provide monitoring features, its real-time alerting system might not be as immediate or proactive as Snyk's.

5. Pricing and Licensing Model: The pricing and licensing models of Snyk and WhiteSource also differ significantly. Snyk offers flexible pricing options that cater to different use cases, including free plans for open-source projects and paid plans for commercial use. Their pricing is often based on the number of users, projects, or vulnerability tests. WhiteSource, on the other hand, generally follows an enterprise-oriented pricing structure, which may not be as suitable for smaller development teams or open-source projects.

6. Reporting and Analytics Capabilities: Both Snyk and WhiteSource provide detailed reports and analytics on security vulnerabilities, including various metrics and visualizations. However, Snyk offers more advanced reporting capabilities, such as vulnerability trending and benchmarking against industry standards. Snyk's reporting features provide deeper insights into the overall security posture of the development projects and assist in making informed decisions regarding vulnerability management.

In Summary, Snyk and WhiteSource differ in terms of integration capability, language support, remediation recommendations, continuous monitoring, pricing and licensing model, and reporting/analytics capabilities, making each tool unique in its own way.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Snyk, WhiteSource

Bryan

SRE Manager at Subsplash

Apr 1, 2020

Needs adviceon

WhiteSource

Snyk

Sonatype Nexus

I'm beginning to research the right way to better integrate how we achieve SCA / shift-left / SecureDevOps / secure software supply chain. If you use or have evaluated WhiteSource, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus, SonarQube or similar, I would very much appreciate your perspective on strengths and weaknesses and how you selected your ultimate solution. I want to integrate with GitLab CI.

461k views461k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Snyk	WhiteSource
Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform	The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.
-	Open source components identification; Open source security management; Open source licensees management Open source policies enforcement; Due diligence report;
Statistics
Stacks 580	Stacks 25
Followers 380	Followers 67
Votes 20	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Github Integration 5 Free for open source projects 4 Finds lots of real vulnerabilities 1 Easy to deployed Cons 2 Does not integrated with SonarQube 1 False positives 1 Complex UI 1 No surface monitoring 1 No malware detection	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Scala .NET GitHub CircleCI Docker JavaScript Node.js Python Golang Java	Apache Ant Docker AWS CodeBuild Apache Maven PHP Google Cloud Build .NET Core CocoaPods npm TeamCity

What are some alternatives to Snyk, WhiteSource?

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.