Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GoInstant

0
3
+ 1
14
Socket.IO

13K
10.7K
+ 1
785
Add tool

GoInstant vs Socket.IO: What are the differences?

<GoInstant vs. Socket.IO>

1. **Real-time Capabilities**: GoInstant is specifically designed for real-time data synchronization across multiple clients in a collaborative environment, making it ideal for interactive applications. On the other hand, Socket.IO is a more versatile library that can handle real-time communication, but it may not offer the same level of synchronization and collaboration features as GoInstant.

2. **Scalability**: GoInstant provides built-in scalability features, such as automatic data partitioning and load balancing, to ensure robust performance even with a large number of concurrent users. In contrast, Socket.IO may require additional configurations or third-party services to achieve the same level of scalability.

3. **Data Persistence**: GoInstant includes data persistence capabilities, allowing data to be stored and retrieved even when clients are offline. In comparison, while Socket.IO can facilitate real-time communication, it may not offer the same level of data persistence without additional implementations.

4. **Authentication and Security**: GoInstant provides secure authentication mechanisms and built-in security features to protect data transmission and ensure data privacy. Socket.IO may require additional security measures to achieve a similar level of protection for real-time communication.

5. **Integration and Ecosystem**: GoInstant offers a comprehensive ecosystem with additional tools and services for developers to integrate and enhance their applications. Socket.IO, while popular and widely used, may require more customization and third-party extensions for specific integration needs.

6. **Cost and Licensing**: The pricing model and licensing terms for GoInstant and Socket.IO may differ significantly, impacting the overall cost of using these technologies in a production environment.

In Summary, GoInstant and Socket.IO differ in their real-time capabilities, scalability, data persistence, authentication and security, integration ecosystem, and cost considerations.

Advice on GoInstant and Socket.IO
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 466.9K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of GoInstant
Pros of Socket.IO
  • 4
    Easy to integrate
  • 4
    Client side only applications without server hassle
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 1
    Great AngularJS adapter
  • 1
    Great support
  • 1
    Quick and simple storage with realtime sync
  • 1
    Heroku Add-on
  • 219
    Real-time
  • 143
    Node.js
  • 141
    Event-based communication
  • 102
    Open source
  • 102
    WebSockets
  • 26
    Binary streaming
  • 21
    No internet dependency
  • 10
    Large community
  • 9
    Fallback to polling if WebSockets not supported
  • 6
    Push notification
  • 5
    Ease of access and setup
  • 1
    Test

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GoInstant
Cons of Socket.IO
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 12
      Bad documentation
    • 4
      Githubs that complement it are mostly deprecated
    • 3
      Doesn't work on React Native
    • 2
      Small community
    • 2
      Websocket Errors

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is GoInstant?

    It is a service for building web and mobile realtime apps easily. Simply add its library to your application to gain access to shared data storage, pub/sub messaging and more.

    What is Socket.IO?

    It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use GoInstant?
    What companies use Socket.IO?
      No companies found
      See which teams inside your own company are using GoInstant or Socket.IO.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with GoInstant?
      What tools integrate with Socket.IO?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to GoInstant and Socket.IO?
      Firebase
      Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
      ws
      It is a simple to use, blazing fast, and thoroughly tested WebSocket client and server implementation.
      Pusher
      Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.
      Google Cloud Pub/Sub
      Cloud Pub/Sub is a fully-managed real-time messaging service that allows you to send and receive messages between independent applications. You can leverage Cloud Pub/Sub’s flexibility to decouple systems and components hosted on Google Cloud Platform or elsewhere on the Internet.
      SignalR
      SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.
      See all alternatives