Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Docusaurus

226
411
+ 1
34
Swagger UI

1.9K
1.7K
+ 1
207
Add tool

Docusaurus vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?

Key differences between Docusaurus and Swagger UI

  1. Language and Purpose: Docusaurus is a static site generator specifically designed for creating documentation websites. It focuses on providing a clean and user-friendly interface for developers to document their projects. On the other hand, Swagger UI is a tool for visualizing and interacting with APIs. It enables developers to explore and test APIs by generating interactive documentation.
  2. Content Structure: Docusaurus follows a hierarchical structure for organizing content, allowing developers to create multiple nested pages and sections. It supports markdown files for easy content creation. In contrast, Swagger UI generates documentation directly from API specifications written in OpenAPI (formerly known as Swagger), which follows a standardized format for describing APIs.
  3. User Experience: Docusaurus provides a more customizable and flexible user experience, allowing developers to customize the theme, layout, and styling to match their branding. It also provides search functionality, navigation menus, and sidebar navigation for easy content discovery. Swagger UI, on the other hand, focuses on providing a consistent and intuitive interface for interacting with APIs, with features like request/response customization, live requests, and API key authentication.
  4. Versioning and Releases: Docusaurus offers built-in support for versioning and releases, making it easy to manage and publish documentation for different versions of a project. It allows developers to serve specific versions of the documentation based on the user's preference. Swagger UI does not provide built-in versioning support, and developers typically need to handle versioning manually by generating separate API specifications for each version.
  5. Backend Integration: Docusaurus can be deployed as a static website, which makes it easy to host on various platforms without the need for a backend server. It supports integration with version control systems like Git, enabling automatic deployment when pushing changes to the repository. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is typically used alongside backend APIs, requiring a server to host the API documentation and serve the API requests.
  6. Target Audience: Docusaurus primarily targets developers who want to create comprehensive documentation websites for their projects, making it suitable for open-source projects, libraries, and APIs. Swagger UI, on the other hand, targets developers who need interactive documentation for exploring and testing APIs, making it more suitable for backend developers and API providers.

In summary, Docusaurus is a static site generator for creating documentation websites, offering customization, versioning, and a user-friendly experience. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is primarily focused on visualizing and interacting with APIs, providing interactive documentation based on OpenAPI specifications.

Advice on Docusaurus and Swagger UI
Needs advice
on
PostmanPostmanApiaryApiary
and
Swagger UISwagger UI

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

See more
Replies (3)
Jagdeep Singh
Tech Lead at ucreate.it · | 8 upvotes · 377.2K views

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

See more

I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.

See more
Sadik Ay
Recommends
on
PostmanPostman

I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Docusaurus
Pros of Swagger UI
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 7
    Self Hosted
  • 3
    MDX
  • 3
    I18n
  • 3
    Free to use
  • 3
    React
  • 3
    Easy customization
  • 3
    Jamstack
  • 2
    Versioning
  • 49
    Open Source
  • 34
    Can execute api calls from the documentation
  • 29
    Free to use
  • 19
    Customizable
  • 14
    Easy to implement in .Net
  • 13
    Mature, clean spec
  • 12
    API Visualization
  • 9
    Coverage
  • 6
    Scaffolding
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 5
    Vibrant and active community
  • 4
    Elegant
  • 3
    Adopted by tm forum api
  • 2
    Clear for React
  • 1
    Api
  • 1
    Can deploy API to AWS API Gateway and AWS Lambda

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Docusaurus
Cons of Swagger UI
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Need to learn YAML and RAML
    • 2
      Documentation doesn't look that good
    • 1
      Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages
    • 1
      You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting
    • 1
      Does not support hypermedia

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Docusaurus?

    Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

    What is Swagger UI?

    Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Docusaurus?
    What companies use Swagger UI?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Docusaurus or Swagger UI.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Docusaurus?
    What tools integrate with Swagger UI?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Docusaurus and Swagger UI?
    Confluence
    Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.
    Gitbook
    It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
    MkDocs
    It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
    VuePress
    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
    Hugo
    Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
    See all alternatives