CrossBrowserTesting  vs TestComplete

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CrossBrowserTesting

37
41
+ 1
0
TestComplete

35
57
+ 1
0
Add tool

CrossBrowserTesting vs TestComplete: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Integration with Automation Tools**: CrossBrowserTesting provides integrations with popular automation tools like Selenium and Appium, making it easier for teams to incorporate automated testing into their workflows. TestComplete, on the other hand, offers a robust built-in scripting language and IDE for creating and executing automated tests without the need for additional tools.

2. **Cloud Testing Capabilities**: CrossBrowserTesting offers a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to test their web and mobile applications on a wide range of browsers and devices. TestComplete, on the other hand, primarily focuses on desktop and web application testing within the local environment, with limited cloud testing capabilities.

3. **Object Recognition Approach**: TestComplete employs a unique Test Visualizer tool that uses AI-driven technology for robust object recognition, making it easier to create stable tests even when UI elements change. In contrast, CrossBrowserTesting relies on traditional object identification methods, such as XPath and CSS selectors, which may require more manual maintenance as UI changes occur.

4. **Mobile Testing Support**: CrossBrowserTesting excels in mobile testing, offering a variety of mobile devices and OS versions for comprehensive mobile app testing. TestComplete, while capable of mobile testing, does not offer as extensive a range of mobile devices for testing purposes.

5. **Community and Support**: TestComplete boasts a strong community of users and developers who actively contribute to forums and knowledge bases, providing valuable insights and support to users. CrossBrowserTesting, while offering support resources, may not have as active a community presence for users seeking assistance.

6. **Licensing Model**: TestComplete follows a traditional licensing model where users purchase a license based on the number of users and features needed. In comparison, CrossBrowserTesting offers a subscription-based pricing model with different tiers based on the level of testing required, providing more flexibility for teams with varying testing needs.

In Summary, CrossBrowserTesting and TestComplete differ in their integration with automation tools, cloud testing capabilities, object recognition approach, mobile testing support, community and support, and licensing model, catering to different testing requirements and preferences.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More

What is CrossBrowserTesting ?

It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.

What is TestComplete?

It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use CrossBrowserTesting ?
What companies use TestComplete?
See which teams inside your own company are using CrossBrowserTesting or TestComplete.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with CrossBrowserTesting ?
What tools integrate with TestComplete?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting and TestComplete?
LambdaTest
LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.
BrowserStack
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.
Selenium
Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
Karma
Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.
Playwright
It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
See all alternatives