Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Git vs Vault: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Git and Vault are both tools commonly used in software development for version control and source code management. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.
Architecture: Git is a distributed version control system, where each user has their own copy of the repository with the complete history. In contrast, Vault is a centralized secrets management tool that stores and manages sensitive data like credentials, API keys, and encryption keys in a secure central location.
Versioning: Git is primarily focused on version control, allowing developers to track changes to source code over time. It provides features like branching, merging, and commit history. On the other hand, Vault does not focus on versioning but rather on securing and managing sensitive data, allowing granular access control and providing encryption at rest.
Collaboration: Git is designed for collaboration, enabling multiple developers to work on the same codebase concurrently. It provides features like pull requests and conflict resolution. Vault, on the other hand, is not designed for collaboration but rather for secure storage and management of secrets.
Workflow Integration: Git seamlessly integrates with various development workflows and is widely used in the software development lifecycle. It can be easily integrated with continuous integration and continuous deployment systems. While Vault can also be integrated into development workflows, its primary focus is on the secure management of secrets rather than code deployment.
User Access: Git repositories can be accessed by developers who have permission to access the repository. Different levels of access can be granted to different users or teams. In Vault, access control is more granular and can be fine-tuned based on specific secrets or data. It provides features like dynamic secrets and leases for secure access management.
Use Cases: Git is primarily used for version control and source code management in software development, enabling developers to work collaboratively and track changes to source code. Vault, on the other hand, is used for secure storage and management of sensitive data, such as database credentials, encryption keys, and API keys. It is commonly used in DevOps and cloud-native environments to manage secrets and ensure the secure operation of applications and infrastructure.
In Summary, Git is a distributed version control system focused on code collaboration and versioning, while Vault is a centralized secrets management tool designed for secure storage and management of sensitive data.
Pros of Git
- Distributed version control system1.4K
- Efficient branching and merging1.1K
- Fast959
- Open source845
- Better than svn726
- Great command-line application368
- Simple306
- Free291
- Easy to use232
- Does not require server222
- Distributed27
- Small & Fast22
- Feature based workflow18
- Staging Area15
- Most wide-spread VSC13
- Role-based codelines11
- Disposable Experimentation11
- Frictionless Context Switching7
- Data Assurance6
- Efficient5
- Just awesome4
- Github integration3
- Easy branching and merging3
- Compatible2
- Flexible2
- Possible to lose history and commits2
- Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing1
- Light1
- Team Integration1
- Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system1
- Easy1
- Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast1
- CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome1
- It's what you do1
- Phinx0
Pros of Vault
- Secure17
- Variety of Secret Backends13
- Very easy to set up and use11
- Dynamic secret generation8
- AuditLog5
- Privilege Access Management3
- Leasing and Renewal3
- Easy to integrate with2
- Open Source2
- Consol integration2
- Handles secret sprawl2
- Variety of Auth Backends2
- Multicloud1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Git
- Hard to learn16
- Inconsistent command line interface11
- Easy to lose uncommitted work9
- Worst documentation ever possibly made7
- Awful merge handling5
- Unexistent preventive security flows3
- Rebase hell3
- When --force is disabled, cannot rebase2
- Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly2
- Doesn't scale for big data1