Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

EMQX

30
105
+ 1
6

EMQ vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

  1. Message Routing: The key difference between EMQ and VerneMQ lies in their message routing capabilities. EMQ offers flexible and powerful message routing options, allowing users to configure message routing rules based on topic patterns, message content, and other criteria. On the other hand, VerneMQ provides a more traditional publish-subscribe architecture with hierarchical topics, where messages are published to specific topic namespaces and subscribers can subscribe to these topics to receive the messages.

  2. Scalability and Clustering: EMQ excels in scalability and clustering. It provides built-in support for horizontal scaling and can be easily extended to handle millions of concurrent MQTT connections. EMQ uses a distributed cluster architecture, enabling high availability and fault-tolerant deployments. VerneMQ, although also capable of clustering, does not have the same level of scalability as EMQ, making it more suitable for smaller-scale deployments or use cases with lower message throughput requirements.

  3. Security Features: EMQ and VerneMQ offer different security features. EMQ supports advanced features such as SSL/TLS encryption, client certificate-based authentication, and access control lists (ACLs) for fine-grained authorization. VerneMQ, on the other hand, provides basic security features like SSL/TLS encryption and simple user-based authentication, making it more suitable for scenarios where stringent security requirements are not a priority.

  4. Management and Monitoring: EMQ provides a comprehensive set of management and monitoring tools. It offers a web-based dashboard for visualizing and managing MQTT connections, as well as RESTful APIs for programmatically interacting with the broker. EMQ also provides extensive metrics and logging capabilities for monitoring the broker's performance and activity. VerneMQ, while providing some management and monitoring features, does not have the same level of tooling and visibility as EMQ.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: EMQ boasts a vibrant plugin ecosystem, allowing users to extend the functionality of the broker with various plugins. These plugins cover a wide range of use cases, including message persistence, authentication and authorization, integration with external systems, and more. VerneMQ, while also supporting plugins, has a more limited selection and may not offer the same level of extensibility as EMQ.

  6. Community and Support: EMQ has a larger and more active community compared to VerneMQ. This means that there is a wealth of resources, documentation, and community-driven support available for EMQ users. VerneMQ, while also having a community and support channels, may not have the same level of activity and resources as EMQ.

In Summary, EMQ and VerneMQ differ in message routing capabilities, scalability and clustering, security features, management and monitoring tools, plugin ecosystem, and community and support. EMQ offers more flexible and powerful message routing, better scalability and clustering, advanced security features, comprehensive management and monitoring, a vibrant plugin ecosystem, and a larger community and support network compared to VerneMQ.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of EMQX
  • 3
    QoS 2
  • 2
    Clusters
  • 1
    Plugins

What is EMQX?

EMQX is a cloud-native, MQTT-based, IoT messaging platform designed for high reliability and massive scale. Licensed under the Apache Version 2.0, EMQX is 100% compliant with MQTT 5.0 and 3.x standard protocol specifications.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use EMQX?
See which teams inside your own company are using EMQX or undefined.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with EMQX?
What are some alternatives to and EMQX?
MQTT
It was designed as an extremely lightweight publish/subscribe messaging transport. It is useful for connections with remote locations where a small code footprint is required and/or network bandwidth is at a premium.
Mosquitto
It is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices from low power single board computers to full servers.. The MQTT protocol provides a lightweight method of carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe model. This makes it suitable for Internet of Things messaging such as with low power sensors or mobile devices such as phones, embedded computers or microcontrollers.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
Kafka
Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
Amazon SQS
Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
See all alternatives