WSO2 vs Zuul

Overview

Zuul

Stacks392

Followers385

Votes8

WSO2

Stacks84

Followers164

Votes0

GitHub Stars932

Forks862

WSO2 vs Zuul: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will compare the key differences between WSO2 and Zuul.

Architecture: WSO2 is an open-source integration platform that offers a complete middleware solution, including API management, enterprise integration, and identity management. On the other hand, Zuul is a dynamic routing and monitoring tool that can be used for microservices architecture and is commonly used as a gateway service.
Supported Protocols: WSO2 supports various communication protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS, JMS, AMQP, MQTT, and more, making it versatile for integrating different systems. Zuul, on the other hand, primarily focuses on HTTP and HTTPS communication protocols for routing and filtering requests.
Community Support: WSO2 has a large and active open-source community that provides support, documentation, and tools for developers. Zuul, while being open-source as well, has a smaller community compared to WSO2, which may affect the availability of resources and support.
Deployment Options: WSO2 offers multiple deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments, providing flexibility for organizations with diverse infrastructure requirements. Zuul is typically deployed as a part of the Netflix OSS ecosystem and is commonly used in cloud-based environments.
Scalability: WSO2 is designed to handle large-scale enterprise deployments and offers scalability features such as load balancing, clustering, and high availability. Zuul, being a lightweight tool, may require additional configurations or third-party services to achieve the same level of scalability as WSO2.
Customization and Extensibility: WSO2 provides a wide range of customization options through its extensive set of components, connectors, and APIs, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific integration needs. While Zuul offers some customization capabilities, it may not provide the same level of extensibility as WSO2 out of the box.

In Summary, WSO2 and Zuul differ in terms of architecture, supported protocols, community support, deployment options, scalability, and customization capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zuul	WSO2
It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.	It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.
-	100% Open Source;Largest Platform Built on Single Code Base;Cloud Enabled;Premium Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 932
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 862
Stacks 392	Stacks 84
Followers 385	Followers 164
Votes 8	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Load blancing	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Segment Zapier Postman

What are some alternatives to Zuul, WSO2?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

WSO2 vs Zuul: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will compare the key differences between WSO2 and Zuul.

Architecture: WSO2 is an open-source integration platform that offers a complete middleware solution, including API management, enterprise integration, and identity management. On the other hand, Zuul is a dynamic routing and monitoring tool that can be used for microservices architecture and is commonly used as a gateway service.
Supported Protocols: WSO2 supports various communication protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS, JMS, AMQP, MQTT, and more, making it versatile for integrating different systems. Zuul, on the other hand, primarily focuses on HTTP and HTTPS communication protocols for routing and filtering requests.
Community Support: WSO2 has a large and active open-source community that provides support, documentation, and tools for developers. Zuul, while being open-source as well, has a smaller community compared to WSO2, which may affect the availability of resources and support.
Deployment Options: WSO2 offers multiple deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments, providing flexibility for organizations with diverse infrastructure requirements. Zuul is typically deployed as a part of the Netflix OSS ecosystem and is commonly used in cloud-based environments.
Scalability: WSO2 is designed to handle large-scale enterprise deployments and offers scalability features such as load balancing, clustering, and high availability. Zuul, being a lightweight tool, may require additional configurations or third-party services to achieve the same level of scalability as WSO2.
Customization and Extensibility: WSO2 provides a wide range of customization options through its extensive set of components, connectors, and APIs, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific integration needs. While Zuul offers some customization capabilities, it may not provide the same level of extensibility as WSO2 out of the box.

In Summary, WSO2 and Zuul differ in terms of architecture, supported protocols, community support, deployment options, scalability, and customization capabilities.

WSO2 vs Zuul

Overview

WSO2 vs Zuul: What are the differences?