Alternatives to Varnish logo

Alternatives to Varnish

NGINX, Redis, HAProxy, Apache Traffic Server, and Squid are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Varnish.
12.4K
2.6K
+ 1
370

What is Varnish and what are its top alternatives?

Varnish is a powerful HTTP accelerator designed to improve web performance by caching web content. It serves as a reverse proxy cache and is known for its ability to handle high traffic websites efficiently. Varnish can significantly reduce server load and improve response times by caching static content and serving it directly to clients. However, Varnish can be complex to configure and may require advanced knowledge to maximize its benefits.

  1. NGINX: NGINX is a popular open-source web server and reverse proxy option that is highly flexible and scalable. It offers features like load balancing, caching, and SSL termination. Pros: Easy to configure, lightweight, supports a wide range of plugins. Cons: May not be as specialized for caching as Varnish.
  2. Apache Traffic Server: Apache Traffic Server is an open-source caching and proxy server that can handle large amounts of traffic efficiently. It offers caching, reverse proxy, and load balancing features. Pros: High performance, extensible with plugins. Cons: Configuration can be complex.
  3. Squid: Squid is a powerful proxy caching server that can enhance web performance by caching frequently accessed content. It supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. Pros: Robust caching capabilities, versatile in handling various protocols. Cons: Configuration can be challenging for beginners.
  4. HAProxy: HAProxy is a reliable and high-performance TCP/HTTP load balancer that can also be used for proxying and rate limiting. It offers advanced load balancing algorithms. Pros: Fast and efficient, supports SSL termination. Cons: Not specifically designed for caching.
  5. LiteSpeed Web Server: LiteSpeed Web Server is a high-performance commercial web server with built-in caching capabilities. It offers features like QUIC support and LSQUIC for improved performance. Pros: Fast, efficient caching, supports QUIC. Cons: Cost for commercial license.
  6. Caddy: Caddy is a modern web server with automatic HTTPS and advanced caching capabilities. It is easy to configure and supports HTTP/2 by default. Pros: Easy to set up, automatic HTTPS, great performance. Cons: Limited advanced features compared to Varnish.
  7. ServingHUB: ServingHUB is a cloud-based content delivery network (CDN) that offers advanced caching and optimization features to accelerate websites. It includes easy setup and seamless integration with various platforms. Pros: Fully managed, scalable, detailed analytics. Cons: Subscription-based pricing.
  8. KeyCDN: KeyCDN is a content delivery network that provides fast and secure delivery of web content globally. It offers features like HTTP/2 support, real-time analytics, and DDoS protection. Pros: Fast performance, easy to use, affordable pricing. Cons: Less control over caching compared to Varnish.
  9. Fastly: Fastly is a powerful edge cloud platform that offers fast and secure content delivery, real-time analytics, and flexible configuration options. It can be used for caching, streaming, and security. Pros: Global network, real-time analytics, advanced security features. Cons: Higher cost for extensive usage.
  10. CloudFlare: CloudFlare is a popular CDN and security platform that offers content delivery, DDoS protection, and web optimization services. It can cache static content and accelerate dynamic content delivery. Pros: Easy to set up, free plan available, strong security features. Cons: Limited control over caching compared to Varnish.

Top Alternatives to Varnish

  • NGINX
    NGINX

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018. ...

  • Redis
    Redis

    Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams. ...

  • HAProxy
    HAProxy

    HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications. ...

  • Apache Traffic Server
    Apache Traffic Server

    It is a fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2.0 compliant caching proxy server.Improve your response time, while reducing server load and bandwidth needs by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages, images, and web ser ...

  • Squid
    Squid

    Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL. ...

  • Section
    Section

    Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge. ...

  • Nuster
    Nuster

    nuster is a high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy. ...

Varnish alternatives & related posts

NGINX logo

NGINX

112K
59.9K
5.5K
A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet.
112K
59.9K
+ 1
5.5K
PROS OF NGINX
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 893
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 288
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 225
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
CONS OF NGINX
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription

related NGINX posts

Recently I have been working on an open source stack to help people consolidate their personal health data in a single database so that AI and analytics apps can be run against it to find personalized treatments. We chose to go with a #containerized approach leveraging Docker #containers with a local development environment setup with Docker Compose and nginx for container routing. For the production environment we chose to pull code from GitHub and build/push images using Jenkins and using Kubernetes to deploy to Amazon EC2.

We also implemented a dashboard app to handle user authentication/authorization, as well as a custom SSO server that runs on Heroku which allows experts to easily visit more than one instance without having to login repeatedly. The #Backend was implemented using my favorite #Stack which consists of FeathersJS on top of Node.js and ExpressJS with PostgreSQL as the main database. The #Frontend was implemented using React, Redux.js, Semantic UI React and the FeathersJS client. Though testing was light on this project, we chose to use AVA as well as ESLint to keep the codebase clean and consistent.

See more

Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

See more
Redis logo

Redis

58.1K
44.8K
3.9K
Open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store
58.1K
44.8K
+ 1
3.9K
PROS OF REDIS
  • 886
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 513
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
  • 194
    Open source
  • 182
    Easy to deploy
  • 164
    Stable
  • 155
    Free
  • 121
    Fast
  • 42
    High-Performance
  • 40
    High Availability
  • 35
    Data Structures
  • 32
    Very Scalable
  • 24
    Replication
  • 22
    Great community
  • 22
    Pub/Sub
  • 19
    "NoSQL" key-value data store
  • 16
    Hashes
  • 13
    Sets
  • 11
    Sorted Sets
  • 10
    NoSQL
  • 10
    Lists
  • 9
    Async replication
  • 9
    BSD licensed
  • 8
    Bitmaps
  • 8
    Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background
  • 7
    Keys with a limited time-to-live
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 6
    Lua scripting
  • 6
    Strings
  • 5
    Awesomeness for Free
  • 5
    Hyperloglogs
  • 4
    Transactions
  • 4
    Outstanding performance
  • 4
    Runs server side LUA
  • 4
    LRU eviction of keys
  • 4
    Feature Rich
  • 4
    Written in ANSI C
  • 4
    Networked
  • 3
    Data structure server
  • 3
    Performance & ease of use
  • 2
    Dont save data if no subscribers are found
  • 2
    Automatic failover
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Temporarily kept on disk
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    Existing Laravel Integration
  • 2
    Channels concept
  • 2
    Object [key/value] size each 500 MB
  • 2
    Simple
CONS OF REDIS
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL

related Redis posts

Robert Zuber

We use MongoDB as our primary #datastore. Mongo's approach to replica sets enables some fantastic patterns for operations like maintenance, backups, and #ETL.

As we pull #microservices from our #monolith, we are taking the opportunity to build them with their own datastores using PostgreSQL. We also use Redis to cache data we’d never store permanently, and to rate-limit our requests to partners’ APIs (like GitHub).

When we’re dealing with large blobs of immutable data (logs, artifacts, and test results), we store them in Amazon S3. We handle any side-effects of S3’s eventual consistency model within our own code. This ensures that we deal with user requests correctly while writes are in process.

See more

I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

See more
HAProxy logo

HAProxy

2.4K
2.1K
561
The Reliable, High Performance TCP/HTTP Load Balancer
2.4K
2.1K
+ 1
561
PROS OF HAPROXY
  • 131
    Load balancer
  • 102
    High performance
  • 69
    Very fast
  • 58
    Proxying for tcp and http
  • 55
    SSL termination
  • 31
    Open source
  • 27
    Reliable
  • 20
    Free
  • 18
    Well-Documented
  • 12
    Very popular
  • 7
    Runs health checks on backends
  • 7
    Suited for very high traffic web sites
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 5
    Ready to Docker
  • 4
    Powers many world's most visited sites
  • 3
    Simple
  • 2
    Ssl offloading
  • 2
    Work with NTLM
  • 1
    Available as a plugin for OPNsense
  • 1
    Redis
CONS OF HAPROXY
  • 6
    Becomes your single point of failure

related HAProxy posts

Around the time of their Series A, Pinterest’s stack included Python and Django, with Tornado and Node.js as web servers. Memcached / Membase and Redis handled caching, with RabbitMQ handling queueing. Nginx, HAproxy and Varnish managed static-delivery and load-balancing, with persistent data storage handled by MySQL.

See more
Tom Klein

We're using Git through GitHub for public repositories and GitLab for our private repositories due to its easy to use features. Docker and Kubernetes are a must have for our highly scalable infrastructure complimented by HAProxy with Varnish in front of it. We are using a lot of npm and Visual Studio Code in our development sessions.

See more
Apache Traffic Server logo

Apache Traffic Server

452
55
0
RFC compliant, high performance HTTP proxy cache
452
55
+ 1
0
PROS OF APACHE TRAFFIC SERVER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF APACHE TRAFFIC SERVER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Apache Traffic Server posts

      Squid logo

      Squid

      102
      204
      17
      A caching proxy for the Web supporting HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more
      102
      204
      + 1
      17
      PROS OF SQUID
      • 4
        Easy to config
      • 2
        Web application accelerator
      • 2
        Cluster
      • 2
        Very Fast
      • 1
        ICP
      • 1
        High-performance
      • 1
        Very Stable
      • 1
        Open Source
      • 1
        Widely Used
      • 1
        Great community
      • 1
        ESI
      • 0
        Qq
      CONS OF SQUID
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Squid posts

        Section logo

        Section

        53
        64
        63
        Run compute workloads on a distributed edge
        53
        64
        + 1
        63
        PROS OF SECTION
        • 10
          Makes the hard parts of varnish easy
        • 10
          Realtime stats
        • 8
          No more hair pulling configuring caching
        • 8
          Git support
        • 7
          Easy setup
        • 6
          Qa testing
        • 5
          Test Varnish Settings in Dev & Prod
        • 4
          Kibana logs
        • 3
          Graphite out of the box
        • 2
          Professional, rock solid platform, easy to user
        CONS OF SECTION
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Section posts

          Nuster logo

          Nuster

          6
          29
          11
          A high performance HTTP proxy cache server and RESTful NoSQL cache server based on HAProxy.
          6
          29
          + 1
          11
          PROS OF NUSTER
          • 2
            Easy to configure
          • 1
            High-performance
          • 1
            Web cache
          • 1
            Web application accelerator
          • 1
            Very Fast
          • 1
            Open Source
          • 1
            Load balancer
          • 1
            Proxying for tcp and http
          • 1
            SSL termination
          • 1
            Free
          • 0
            HTTP reverse proxy
          CONS OF NUSTER
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Nuster posts