Alternatives to Prototype logo

Alternatives to Prototype

jQuery, React, AngularJS, Vue.js, and jQuery UI are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Prototype.
2.2K
29
+ 1
0

What is Prototype and what are its top alternatives?

Prototype is a JavaScript framework that aims to ease development of dynamic web applications. It offers a familiar class-style OO framework, extensive Ajax support, higher-order programming constructs, and easy DOM manipulation.
Prototype is a tool in the Javascript UI Libraries category of a tech stack.
Prototype is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Prototype's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Prototype

  • jQuery
    jQuery

    jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML. ...

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • AngularJS
    AngularJS

    AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding. ...

  • Vue.js
    Vue.js

    It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API. ...

  • jQuery UI
    jQuery UI

    Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice. ...

  • Select2
    Select2

    It gives you a customizable select box with support for searching, tagging, remote data sets, infinite scrolling, and many other highly used options. It comes with support for RTL environments, searching with diacritics and over 40 languages built-in. ...

  • YUI Library
    YUI Library

    It is a free, open source JavaScript and CSS library for building richly interactive web applications. Its lightweight core and modular architecture make it scalable, fast, and robust. ...

  • Svelte
    Svelte

    If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads. ...

Prototype alternatives & related posts

jQuery logo

jQuery

179K
58.1K
6.6K
The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.
179K
58.1K
+ 1
6.6K
PROS OF JQUERY
  • 1.3K
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 807
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
  • 458
    Easy
  • 395
    Popular
  • 350
    Feature-rich
  • 281
    Html5
  • 227
    Light weight
  • 92
    Simple
  • 84
    Great community
  • 79
    CSS3 Compliant
  • 69
    Mobile friendly
  • 67
    Fast
  • 43
    Intuitive
  • 42
    Swiss Army knife for webdev
  • 35
    Huge Community
  • 11
    Easy to learn
  • 4
    Clean code
  • 3
    Because of Ajax request :)
  • 2
    Just awesome
  • 2
    Used everywhere
  • 2
    Powerful
  • 2
    Nice
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 1
    Improves productivity
  • 1
    Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup
  • 1
    It Just Works
  • 1
    Industry acceptance
  • 1
    Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS
  • 1
    Javascript
  • 1
    Easy Setup
CONS OF JQUERY
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature

related jQuery posts

Kir Shatrov
Engineering Lead at Shopify · | 21 upvotes · 822.5K views

The client-side stack of Shopify Admin has been a long journey. It started with HTML templates, jQuery and Prototype. We moved to Batman.js, our in-house Single-Page-Application framework (SPA), in 2013. Then, we re-evaluated our approach and moved back to statically rendered HTML and vanilla JavaScript. As the front-end ecosystem matured, we felt that it was time to rethink our approach again. Last year, we started working on moving Shopify Admin to React and TypeScript.

Many things have changed since the days of jQuery and Batman. JavaScript execution is much faster. We can easily render our apps on the server to do less work on the client, and the resources and tooling for developers are substantially better with React than we ever had with Batman.

#FrameworksFullStack #Languages

See more
Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 3.1M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
React logo

React

139.1K
114.3K
3.9K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
139.1K
114.3K
+ 1
3.9K
PROS OF REACT
  • 787
    Components
  • 661
    Virtual dom
  • 570
    Performance
  • 497
    Simplicity
  • 440
    Composable
  • 178
    Data flow
  • 164
    Declarative
  • 125
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 115
    Reactive updates
  • 113
    Explicit app state
  • 42
    JSX
  • 26
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 20
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 19
    Easy to Use
  • 15
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 11
    Great perfomance
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 9
    Built by Facebook
  • 6
    Speed
  • 6
    TypeScript support
  • 5
    Easy to start
  • 5
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Server Side Rendering
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Awesome
  • 5
    Hooks
  • 5
    Feels like the 90s
  • 4
    Scales super well
  • 4
    Functional
  • 4
    Server side views
  • 4
    Fancy third party tools
  • 4
    Excellent Documentation
  • 4
    Props
  • 4
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 3
    Rich ecosystem
  • 3
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 3
    Super easy
  • 3
    Simple
  • 3
    Has functional components
  • 3
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 3
    SSR
  • 3
    Fast evolving
  • 3
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 3
    Just the View of MVC
  • 3
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 3
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 3
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 3
    Start simple
  • 3
    Has arrow functions
  • 3
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 2
    Easy as Lego
  • 2
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 2
    Sharable
  • 2
    Fragments
  • 2
    Permissively-licensed
  • 1
    Image upload
  • 1
    Recharts
CONS OF REACT
  • 36
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 25
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 24
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 9
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 5
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation
  • 1
    Paradigms change too fast

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 2.1M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 28 upvotes · 1.4M views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
AngularJS logo

AngularJS

52.1K
38.2K
5.2K
Superheroic JavaScript MVW Framework
52.1K
38.2K
+ 1
5.2K
PROS OF ANGULARJS
  • 888
    Quick to develop
  • 588
    Great mvc
  • 572
    Powerful
  • 521
    Restful
  • 503
    Backed by google
  • 349
    Two-way data binding
  • 343
    Javascript
  • 328
    Open source
  • 306
    Dependency injection
  • 197
    Readable
  • 75
    Fast
  • 64
    Directives
  • 63
    Great community
  • 56
    Free
  • 38
    Extend html vocabulary
  • 29
    Components
  • 26
    Easy to test
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 23
    Easy to templates
  • 23
    Great documentation
  • 21
    Easy to start
  • 18
    Awesome
  • 17
    Light weight
  • 14
    Javascript mvw framework
  • 14
    Angular 2.0
  • 13
    Great extensions
  • 13
    Efficient
  • 10
    Easy to prototype with
  • 8
    Coffeescript
  • 8
    High performance
  • 7
    Mvc
  • 7
    Two-way binding
  • 7
    Lots of community modules
  • 6
    Clean and keeps code readable
  • 6
    Easy to e2e
  • 5
    One of the best frameworks
  • 5
    Easy for small applications
  • 4
    Fast development
  • 4
    Works great with jquery
  • 3
    I do not touch DOM
  • 2
    The two-way Data Binding is awesome
  • 2
    Typescript
  • 2
    Dart
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Hierarchical Data Structure
  • 2
    Be a developer, not a plumber.
  • 2
    Declarative programming
  • 1
    Common Place
  • 1
    Great
  • 1
    Very very useful and fast framework for development
  • 1
    Amazing community support
  • 1
    Readable code
  • 1
    Linear learning curve
  • 1
    Scopes
  • 1
    Programming fun again
  • 1
    The powerful of binding, routing and controlling routes
  • 1
    Consistency with backend architecture if using Nest
  • 1
    Fkin awesome
  • 1
    Opinionated in the right areas
  • 1
    Supports api , easy development
CONS OF ANGULARJS
  • 10
    Complex
  • 3
    Dependency injection
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Event Listener Overload
  • 1
    Hard to learn

related AngularJS posts

Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 26 upvotes · 3M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 22 upvotes · 1.5M views

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • Nuxt.js consisting of Vue CLI, Vue Router, vuex, Webpack and Sass (Bundler for HTML5, CSS 3), Babel (Transpiler for JavaScript),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed Vue.js components
  • Vuetify as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • Apollo / GraphQL (incl. GraphiQL) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • ESLint, TSLint and Prettier for coding style and code analyzes
  • Jest as testing framework
  • Google Fonts and Font Awesome for typography and icon toolkit
  • NativeScript-Vue for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
See more
Vue.js logo

Vue.js

45.8K
37.2K
1.5K
A progressive framework for building user interfaces
45.8K
37.2K
+ 1
1.5K
PROS OF VUE.JS
  • 290
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 223
    Good documentation
  • 190
    Components
  • 127
    Simple the best
  • 98
    Simplified AngularJS
  • 88
    Reactive
  • 73
    Intuitive APIs
  • 53
    Javascript
  • 49
    Changed my front end coding life
  • 46
    Configuration is smooth
  • 35
    Easy to learn
  • 33
    So much fun to use
  • 24
    Progressive
  • 20
    Virtual dom
  • 16
    Faster than bulldogs on hot tarmac
  • 11
    It's magic
  • 11
    Component is template, javascript and style in one
  • 9
    Light Weight
  • 9
    Perfomance
  • 9
    Best of Both Worlds
  • 8
    Elegant design
  • 8
    Application structure
  • 8
    Without misleading licenses
  • 7
    Intuitive and easy to use
  • 6
    Good command line interface
  • 5
    Logicless templates
  • 5
    Small learning curve
  • 5
    Like Angular only quicker to get started with
  • 5
    Easy to integrate to HTML by inline-templates
  • 4
    Single file components
  • 3
    Customer Render ending eg to HTML
  • 3
    High performance
  • 2
    Component based
  • 2
    Vuex
  • 2
    Bridge from Web Development to JS Development
  • 2
    Concise error messages
  • 2
    Supports several template languages
  • 2
    One-way data flow
  • 2
    Intuitive
  • 2
    Lots of documentation
  • 1
    GUI
CONS OF VUE.JS
  • 8
    Less Common Place
  • 4
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 2
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
  • 2
    Don't support fragments

related Vue.js posts

Johnny Bell
Shared insights
on
Vue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I've used both Vue.js and React and I would stick with React. I know that Vue.js seems easier to write and its much faster to pick up however as you mentioned above React has way more ready made components you can just plugin, and the community for React is very big.

It might be a bit more of a steep learning curve for your friend to learn React over Vue.js but I think in the long run its the better option.

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 26 upvotes · 3M views

Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

  • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
  • npm as package manager
  • NestJS as Node.js framework
  • TypeScript as programming language
  • ExpressJS as web server
  • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
  • Postman as a tool for API development
  • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
  • JSON Web Token for access token management

The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

  • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
  • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
  • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
  • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
See more
jQuery UI logo

jQuery UI

38.2K
11.4K
897
Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library
38.2K
11.4K
+ 1
897
PROS OF JQUERY UI
  • 214
    Ui components
  • 155
    Cross-browser
  • 121
    Easy
  • 100
    It's jquery
  • 81
    Open source
  • 57
    Widgets
  • 48
    Plugins
  • 46
    Popular
  • 39
    Datepicker
  • 23
    Great community
  • 7
    DOM Manipulation
  • 6
    Themes
  • 0
    Some good ui components
CONS OF JQUERY UI
  • 1
    Does not contain charts or graphs

related jQuery UI posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 3.1M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Khauth György
CTO at SalesAutopilot Kft. · | 12 upvotes · 487.7K views

I'm the CTO of a marketing automation SaaS. Because of the continuously increasing load we moved to the AWSCloud. We are using more and more features of AWS: Amazon CloudWatch, Amazon SNS, Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Route 53 and so on.

Our main Database is MySQL but for the hundreds of GB document data we use MongoDB more and more. We started to use Redis for cache and other time sensitive operations.

On the front-end we use jQuery UI + Smarty but now we refactor our app to use Vue.js with Vuetify. Because our app is relatively complex we need to use vuex as well.

On the development side we use GitHub as our main repo, Docker for local and server environment and Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline for Continuous Integration.

See more
Select2 logo

Select2

2.9K
68
0
The jQuery replacement for select boxes
2.9K
68
+ 1
0
PROS OF SELECT2
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF SELECT2
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Select2 posts

      YUI Library logo

      YUI Library

      1.8K
      22
      0
      Open Source JavaScript library for building richly interactive web applications
      1.8K
      22
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF YUI LIBRARY
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF YUI LIBRARY
          Be the first to leave a con

          related YUI Library posts

          Svelte logo

          Svelte

          1.1K
          1.2K
          449
          A UI framework that compiles into tiny standalone JavaScript modules
          1.1K
          1.2K
          + 1
          449
          PROS OF SVELTE
          • 50
            Performance
          • 36
            Reactivity
          • 32
            Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
          • 31
            Components
          • 31
            Simplicity
          • 29
            Lightweight
          • 25
            Near to no learning curve
          • 25
            Real Reactivity
          • 25
            Fast as vanilajs
          • 19
            All in one
          • 17
            Compiler based
          • 16
            Use existing js libraries
          • 15
            Scalable
          • 14
            SSR
          • 13
            Very easy for beginners
          • 12
            Composable
          • 11
            No runtime overhead
          • 11
            Ease of use
          • 9
            Built in store
          • 8
            Typescript
          • 6
            Best Developer Experience
          • 6
            Start with pure html + css
          • 5
            Templates
          • 3
            Speed
          CONS OF SVELTE
          • 3
            Event Listener Overload
          • 2
            Little to no libraries
          • 2
            Complex
          • 2
            Learning Curve
          • 2
            Hard to learn

          related Svelte posts

          Sarmad Chaudhary
          Founder & CEO at Ebiz Ltd. · | 9 upvotes · 606.2K views

          Hi there!

          I just want to have a simple poll/vote...

          If you guys need a UI/Component Library for React, Vue.js, or AngularJS, which type of library would you prefer between:

          1 ) A single maintained cross-framework library that is 100% compatible and can be integrated with any popular framework like Vue, React, Angular 2, Svelte, etc.

          2) A native framework-specific library developed to work only on target framework like ElementUI for Vue, Ant Design for React.

          Your advice would help a lot! Thanks in advance :)

          See more
          Abdussabur Abdurraheem
          Indie Dev at Idyllics · | 2 upvotes · 635 views
          Shared insights
          on
          ReactReactSvelteSveltethree.jsthree.js

          Just want to start with three.js what materials do you recommend? Also what framework would match perfectly with it? Svelte or React.

          See more