Find the right developer tools and the companies that use them
Feed
Keep up with the tools you care about
Visit Feed
Stacks
Browse top companies’ stacks
Browse Stacks
Trending
Explore popular and trending tools
Explore Tools
Stackups
Compare tools side-by-side
Compare Tools

Stay up-to-date with the tools you use

  • See a personalized feed with the latest news about your tech stack
  • Share why and how you use tools in front of a community of 250K+ fellow developers
  • Get new product updates, articles, and announcements pushed to you daily/weekly
Check Out the Feed
Zarema Khalilova
Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 7 upvotes · 20231 views
atUploadcare
Netlify
Gatsby
React
Node.js
Django
#StaticWebHosting
#StaticSiteGenerators
#Frontend

Since 2011 our frontend was in Django monolith. However, in 2016 we decide to separate #Frontend from Django for independent development and created the custom isomorphic app based on Node.js and React. Now we realized that not need all abilities of the server, and it is sufficient to generate a static site. Gatsby is suitable for our purposes. We can generate HTML from markdown and React views very simply. So, we are updating our frontend to Gatsby now, and maybe we will use Netlify for deployment soon. This will speed up the delivery of new features to production.

#StaticSiteGenerators #StaticWebHosting

See more
Arik Fraimovich
Arik Fraimovich
Vue.js
React
Angular 2
AngularJS

When Redash was created 5 years ago we chose AngularJS as our frontend framework, but as AngularJS was replaced by Angular 2 we had to make a new choice. We decided that we won't migrate to Angular, but to either React or Vue.js. Eventually we decided to migrate to React for the following reasons:

  1. Many in our community are already using React internally and will be able to contribute.
  2. Using react2angular we can do the migration gradually over time instead of having to invest in a big rewrite while halting feature development.

So far the gradual strategy pays off and in the last 3 major releases we already shipped React code in the Angular.js application.

See more
Kir Shatrov
Kir Shatrov
Production Engineer at Shopify · | 19 upvotes · 2719 views
atShopify
GitHub
Rails

The core Shopify app has remained a Rails monolith, but we also have hundreds of other Rails apps across the organization. These are not microservices, but domain-specific apps: Shipping (talks with various shipping providers), Identity (single sign on across all Shopify stores), and App Store to name a few. Managing a hundred apps and keeping them up to date with security updates can be tough, so we've developed ServicesDB, an internal app that keeps track of all production services and helps developers to make sure that they don't miss anything important.

ServicesDB keeps a checklist for each app: ownership, uptime, logs, on-call rotation, exception reporting, and gem security updates. If there are problems with any of those, ServicesDB opens a GitHub issue and pings owners of the app to ask them to address it. ServicesDB also makes it easy to query the infrastructure and answer questions like, “How many apps are on Rails 4.2? How many apps are using an outdated version of gem X? Which apps are calling this service?”.

See more
Jest
redux-thunk
React
Redux.js
redux-saga

Choosing redux-saga for my async Redux.js middleware, for a React application, instead of the typical redux-thunk .

Redux-saga is much easier to test than Redux-thunk - it requires no module mocking at all. Converting from redux-thunk to redux-saga is easy enough, as you are only refactoring the action creators - not your redux store or your react components. I've linked a github repo that shows the same solution with both, including Jest tests.

See more
Kirill Shirinkin
Kirill Shirinkin
Cloud and DevOps Consultant at mkdev · | 5 upvotes · 401 views
atmkdev
Crisp
Intercom

We moved from Intercom to Crisp this April because the price-value ratio of Intercom was not satisfying anymore.

We paid ~140eur for the very basic features of Intercom - Messages Essential and Inbox Essential. This is enough for a chat and API access, but that's all. The price would go up as mkdev grows.

Now there are some features we really would love to have: like a Help Center and Bots, for example. All various advanced routing of messages. Or any other features that Intercom actually has, but sells them separately.

Even though it's very hard to properly calculate the price by looking at Pricing page of Intercom, my guess is that with simple Answer bot and Help Center integration our bill for Intercom could easily double or triple.

After doing a bit of research and looking for a better price-value ration we found Crisp.

Crisp gives us the same Chat features we had from Intercom, but then it adds really cool bot builder, various marketing automation utilities, Help Center that supports multiple languages already today (feature still missing in Intercom) - https://help.mkdev.me/en/, fancy MagicBrowse and LiveAssist, direct integration with Telegram and many more. Price? 95eur for all the features and unlimited operators. And no dependency on number of active users (Crisp founders directly say that charging for active users is bullshit and I can only agree with them).

We've been using Crisp not for too long and even though it's been pretty smooth so far - from integrating with our backend systems to creating a Help Center from scratch - it might be a bit too early to do any conclusions. mkdev co-founder Leo has things to say about the UX of Crisp and I am not really satisfied with Crisp's mobile app. But this is something to get used to, or something that will be improved by Crisp over time. And some aspects of Crisp UX/UI are much nicer than Intercom - for example, custom fields on clients are on very top, so we can quickly jump to admin page of a client in mkdev.me. In Intercom we had to do two clicks and scroll a lot to find this link.

To sum it up, if you are looking for a change from Intercom, give Crisp a try. It's way cheaper and doesn't have any major downsides if you are used to Intercom.

See more

Show your company's entire software stack to thousands of engineers

  • Attract developers by explaining what you use and why
  • Easily reference your software stack by sharing it on job hiring sites
  • Invite your engineering team to contribute to your stack page
Explore Top Stacks

All the best open source, SaaS, and developer tools in one place

  • See what other developers are using
  • Discover new tools submitted by the community
  • Learn why developers like the tools they use
See What's Trending Now

Side-by-side comparisons
of the top options

  • See side by side comparisons of software tools
  • Select and create your own Stackups
  • Decide which tools & services are best for you
Compare Tools

Learn how top startups are scaling their tech stacks

  • Learn how some of the best software products in the world were built
  • Understand how and why companies are using specific technologies
  • Get insight into the technical challenges companies face at scale
Explore Stack Stories

Want to advertise with us?

StackShare In The Press


What is StackShare?
StackShare provides online software for displaying and sharing your technology stack, which is made up of the software that you use. We're an online community that features comparisons, ratings, reviews, recommendations, and discussions of the best software tools and software infrastructure services.